Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
polymorphic test
(version: 6)
polymorphic test
Comparing performance of:
with same function vs with different function
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
with same function
[{ id: 0, url: "https://builder.io", desc: "Visual CMS", }, { id: 1, url: "https://qwik.builder.io", desc: "Instant on web apps", }, { id: 2, url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", }, { id: 3, url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", }, { id: 4, url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", }, { id: 5, url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", }].map((obj) => obj.url)
with different function
[{ id: 0, desc: "Visual CMS", url: "https://builder.io", }, { url: "https://qwik.builder.io", id: 1, desc: "Instant on web apps", }, { id: 2, desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", }, { id: 3, desc: "Instant on 11111111web apps", url: "https://qwik111.builder.io", }, { id: 4, desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", url: "https://qwik111111.builder.io", }, { id: 5, desc: "Instant on 11111web apps", url: "https:/111/qwik111.builder.io", }].map((obj) => obj.url)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
with same function
with different function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 121 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
with same function
13403695.0 Ops/sec
with different function
13555722.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
To explain the provided JSON, we'll break it down into sections. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. It contains information about the test case, including: * `Name` and `Description`: Human-readable names for the benchmark. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields are empty in this case, which means no custom script or HTML needs to be generated before running the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The test cases are an array of objects that define different scenarios for the benchmark. Each object contains a unique set of options that are compared during the benchmarking process. There are two test cases: 1. **"with same function"`**: This test case involves comparing two URL strings that have the same `id` but different `url`s. * The `Benchmark Definition` JSON represents an array of objects with `id` and `url` properties. * The `Test Name` specifies that this test case is for a scenario where the same function (i.e., the same logic) is executed, but with different inputs (the `url` values). 2. **"with different function"`**: This test case involves comparing two URL strings that have different `id`s and `desc` properties. * The `Benchmark Definition` JSON represents an array of objects with `id`, `url`, and `desc` properties. * The `Test Name` specifies that this test case is for a scenario where the same inputs (the `url` values) are used, but with different logic (due to the varying `id` and `desc` properties). **Library Usage** In the provided benchmark definitions, there is no explicit library usage. However, it's possible that some libraries might be indirectly involved in the testing process, such as: * `https://builder.io`: This URL might point to a library or service that generates HTML content. * `https://qwik.builder.io` and its variations: These URLs seem to be related to a web framework or library for building instant-on web apps. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** There is no explicit mention of special JavaScript features or syntax in the provided benchmark definitions. However, it's possible that some of these libraries or frameworks might use specific JavaScript features, such as: * `async/await` or `Promises` for handling asynchronous operations. * `ES6 classes` or `Object.prototype.toString.call()` for working with objects and inheritance. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to benchmarking JavaScript performance, here are a few options: 1. **V8 Benchmark Suite**: A set of benchmarks specifically designed to measure the performance of the V8 JavaScript engine. 2. **BenchmarkDotNet**: An open-source benchmarking library for .NET and JavaScript platforms. 3. **Microbenchmarks**: A general approach to measuring the performance of small code snippets or functions. Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths, weaknesses, and use cases. When choosing a benchmarking tool or approach, consider factors such as the specific use case, language, and framework involved.
Related benchmarks:
if else vs runtime polymorphic
Mono- vs Poly- vs Megamorphic v1
Monomorphic vs Megamorphic (both factory)
Polymorhpic: undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty vs Object.hasOwn
bmm tests2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?