Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
if-else vs switch4
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Switch case vs if-else
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
Tests:
Switch case
const a = 1; switch (a) { case 5: console.log("a is 5"); break; case 4: console.log("a is 4"); break; case 3: console.log("a is 4"); break; }
if-else
const a = 1; if (a == 5) { console.log("a is 5"); } else if (a == 4) { console.log("a is 4"); } else if (a == 3) { console.log("a is 4"); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Switch case
if-else
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 120 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Switch case
208.8M/s
if-else
184.0M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Switch case
208,756,192 Ops/sec
if-else
184,000,848 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple script that checks the execution time of two different conditional statements: `switch` and `if-else`. The script defines a constant `a` with value 1, and then uses both constructs to check if `a` equals 3, 4, or 5. If the condition is true, it logs a message to the console. **Script Preparation Code** There is no script preparation code provided for this benchmark, which means that the test environment will be set up automatically when running the benchmark. **Html Preparation Code** Similarly, there is no html preparation code provided, which suggests that the benchmark is focused on measuring the execution time of the JavaScript code itself, without considering any UI-related overhead. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two individual test cases: 1. **Switch Case**: This test case uses a `switch` statement to check if `a` equals 3, 4, or 5. 2. **if-else**: This test case uses an `if-else` chain to check if `a` equals 3, 4, or 5. **Library and Special JS Features** Neither of the two test cases uses any external libraries. There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these examples, such as async/await, Promises, or destructuring assignments. **Comparison Options** The benchmark is comparing the execution time of the `switch` statement versus the `if-else` chain. This comparison is likely intended to test which construct is faster for this specific use case. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here are some general pros and cons of each approach: * **Switch Statement**: + Pros: Can be more concise and expressive, especially when dealing with multiple cases. + Cons: May have slower performance due to the overhead of looking up the value in an array (switch table). * **if-else Chain**: + Pros: Generally faster, as it only requires a single lookup operation. + Cons: Can be more verbose and harder to read, especially for complex cases. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `switch` and `if-else`, consider the following: * Code readability: If readability is important, `if-else` might be a better choice, as it allows for clear and explicit condition checks. * Performance: For simple cases with few options, `switch` might be faster. However, for more complex cases or larger datasets, `if-else` might be more efficient. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: * **Use Cases**: If the use case requires multiple conditional statements with different types of logic (e.g., string comparison vs. numeric comparison), consider using a library like `switch-case` or `if-else`. * **Template literals**: For more complex cases where you need to handle multiple conditions with variable values, consider using template literals and the `?.` operator. * **Object-based conditionals**: Some modern JavaScript implementations (e.g., ES2017+) offer object-based conditionals, which can simplify certain use cases. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be relevant for simple cases like this benchmark.
Related benchmarks
Switch vs If else CNC
JS switch vs if/else if
map vs ifelse vs switch test
switch(true) vs if-else
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?