Benchmark: Lodash vs. Set Difference Method

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
var b = [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Tests:

Lodash
var c = _.difference(a, b)
Set
const set1 = new Set(a); const set2 = new Set(b); const unionSet = [...a, ...b]; const uniqueNumbers = unionSet.filter( (num) => !(set1.has(num) && set2.has(num)) );

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	8966871.0 Ops/sec
Set	5422174.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark tests two approaches to calculate the set difference between two arrays: using the `Lodash` library and using the native `Set` data structure in JavaScript.

**Options Compared**

The options being compared are:

1. **Lodash**: The `difference()` function from the Lodash library is used to calculate the set difference.
2. **Native Set**: A new `Set` object is created for each array, and then the union of both sets is calculated using the spread operator (`[...a, ...b]`). Finally, an array filter is applied to remove numbers that are present in both sets.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Lodash**: The pros of using Lodash include:
	* It's a widely used and well-maintained library with a large community.
	* It provides a convenient way to perform common operations like set difference.
2. **Native Set**: The pros of using native `Set` include:
	* It's a lightweight and efficient way to perform set operations.
	* It's a built-in feature in JavaScript, so no additional libraries are required.

However, the cons of using Lodash for this specific benchmark are:

* Adding an extra library dependency, which may introduce overhead.
* The performance benefits of using native `Set` might be lost due to the indirection through Lodash.

On the other hand, the pros of using native `Set` include:

* No additional dependencies or overhead.
* Direct access to a lightweight and efficient data structure.

The cons of using native `Set` are:

* It requires more manual effort to implement the set difference logic.
* It may not be as convenient or readable as using Lodash.

**Library Used**

In this benchmark, the Lodash library is used in the following way:
```javascript
var c = _.difference(a, b);
```
The purpose of the `Lodash` library is to provide a convenient way to perform common operations like set difference, union, and intersection. It allows developers to write more concise and readable code without having to implement these operations from scratch.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation. However, it's worth noting that the use of `const` and arrow functions (`(num) => !...)`) is modern JavaScript syntax, but not necessary for understanding the underlying logic.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash vs. Set Difference Method (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Set

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):