Benchmark: assphinxtersayswhats

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) {
  arr[i] = i;
}

function someFn(i) {
  return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2);
}

var sum = 0;

Tests:

forEach
arr.forEach(item => sum += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sum += someFn(item); });
map
arr.map(item => (sum += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sum += someFn(item)));
for
for (var j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) { sum += arr[j] + someFn(arr[j]); }
forOf
for (const num of arr) { sumForOf += num + someFn(num); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
forEach
reduce
map
filter
for
forOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

assphinxtersayswhats (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for vs forOf

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

forEach

reduce

map

filter

for

forOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results