Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash isboolean vs typeof
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs typeof
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var x = true
Tests:
lodash
var y = _.isBoolean(x)
typeof
var y = (typeof(x) === 'boolean')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
typeof
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 120 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
lodash
3834618.2 Ops/sec
typeof
11144679.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition represents a comparison between two approaches: 1. `_.isBoolean(x)` (using Lodash library) 2. `(typeof x === 'boolean')` (using JavaScript's built-in `typeof` operator) **Purpose of the Benchmark** The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of these two approaches in determining whether a variable `x` is a boolean value. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Lodash's `isBoolean` function**: This function takes a value as an argument and returns `true` if it is a boolean value, and `false` otherwise. 2. **JavaScript's built-in `typeof` operator**: This operator returns the type of a variable (e.g., "string", "number", "boolean"). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash's `isBoolean` function**: * Pros: Easy to use, well-documented, and part of a popular library. * Cons: Adds an additional dependency, which may slow down page load times. 2. **JavaScript's built-in `typeof` operator**: * Pros: No dependencies or added overhead, easy to understand and implement. * Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable as the Lodash approach. **Library (Lodash)** The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. The `isBoolean` function is part of this library and can be used to check if a value is a boolean. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition that require specific knowledge or expertise to understand. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare other approaches for determining whether a variable is a boolean, some alternatives could include: * Using `Boolean()` function: `Boolean(x)` * Using `==` or `===` operators with explicit type coercion (e.g., `(x === 'boolean')`) * Implementing a custom boolean check function However, these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the Lodash approach or JavaScript's built-in `typeof` operator. **Benchmark Preparation Code and HTML** The preparation code includes: * A variable `x` initialized to `true` * The Lodash library is included via a script tag This code sets up the test case by defining the value of `x`, which will be used for the subsequent tests.
Related benchmarks:
isFunction vs typeof function 6
lodash isstring vs typeof
lodash isnubmer vs typeof
lodash isboolean vs typeof false
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?