Benchmark: array sort vs math min

Tests:

Sort
var arr = [1418,14980,22222]; var sorted = arr.sort(); var min = sorted[0];
Math min
var arr = [1418,14980,22222]; var min = Math.min(...arr);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Sort
Math min

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Sort	16362082.0 Ops/sec
Math min	14142679.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Description**
The benchmark measures the performance difference between using JavaScript's built-in `sort()` method to sort an array and using the `Math.min()` function with variable arguments (`...`) to find the minimum value in an array.

**Script Preparation Code** and **HTML Preparation Code**: These fields are empty, which means that the script and HTML preparation code are not required for this benchmark. This is a good thing, as it allows users to focus on testing the core logic of the benchmark without worrying about additional setup or overhead.

**Individual Test Cases**
There are two test cases:

1. **Sort**: This test case creates an array `arr` with three elements and sorts it using the `sort()` method. It then assigns the first element of the sorted array to a variable `sorted`. The test case repeats this process 1000000 times (not explicitly stated, but implied by the high number of executions) to warm up the JavaScript engine.
2. **Math min**: This test case creates an array `arr` with three elements and finds its minimum value using the `Math.min()` function with variable arguments (`...`). The test case repeats this process 1000000 times (not explicitly stated, but implied by the high number of executions) to warm up the JavaScript engine.

**Options Compared**
The two test cases compare two approaches:

* **Array sorting**: Using JavaScript's built-in `sort()` method.
* **Math min**: Using the `Math.min()` function with variable arguments (`...`) to find the minimum value in an array.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Array Sorting**:
	+ Pros: Can be used for more complex sorting tasks, takes advantage of JavaScript's built-in sorting algorithms.
	+ Cons: Can be slower than `Math min` due to its overhead and the need to sort the entire array.
* **Math min**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster than `sort()` for small arrays or when finding a single minimum value. Reduces unnecessary array shuffling and copying.
	+ Cons: Limited to finding a single minimum value; may not work correctly if the input array is empty.

**Library/Function Usage**
The test cases use the following libraries/functions:

* **Array.prototype.sort()**: A built-in JavaScript method for sorting arrays.
* **Math.min()**: A built-in JavaScript function for finding the minimum value in an array or a list of numbers.

No external libraries are required, making this benchmark accessible to users with limited resources.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**
This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as `let`, `const`, `async/await`, or ES6 classes. The focus is on comparing two common array manipulation techniques.

**Alternative Approaches**
Other approaches to sorting arrays could be tested in alternative benchmarks, such as:

* Using a custom implementation of the quicksort algorithm.
* Utilizing a library like Lodash's `sortBy()` function.
* Employing a parallel sorting algorithm, such as multi-threading or parallel processing using Web Workers.

These alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark infrastructure and script preparation code.

Related benchmarks:

array sort vs math min (version: 0)

array sort vs math min

Comparing performance of: Sort vs Math min

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Sort

Math min

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):