Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test string index finding
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
While loop brute force vs While loop with IndexOf
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
While loop brute force
var str = "This is a string to test and another string to test"; var find = "string"; var findLength = find.length; var a = []; var i = 0; var length = str.length; while (i < length) { if (str.substr(i, findLength) === find) { a.push(i); i += findLength; } else { i++; } }
While loop with IndexOf
var str = "This is a string to test and another string to test"; var find = "string"; var a = []; var i = 0; while ((i = str.indexOf(find, i+1)) > -1) a.push(i);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
While loop brute force
While loop with IndexOf
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark tests the performance difference between two approaches to find the index of a substring within a string in JavaScript: 1. **While loop brute force**: This approach uses a while loop to iterate through the string and check if the substring matches at each position. 2. **While loop with IndexOf**: This approach uses the `indexOf` method, which is a built-in JavaScript function that finds the index of the first occurrence of a substring within a string. **Options compared** The two approaches are being tested for their performance differences on various browsers and devices. The benchmark measures the number of executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond) for each test case. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **While loop brute force**: + Pros: - Simple to understand and implement. - Can be useful for understanding string manipulation basics. + Cons: - Inefficient, as it checks every position in the string, even if the substring is not found. - May perform poorly on large strings or frequent searches. * **While loop with IndexOf**: + Pros: - More efficient, as it uses an optimized algorithm to find the index of the substring. - Typically faster and more reliable than brute force approach. + Cons: - Requires a working `indexOf` method implementation (which may not be the case in all browsers or environments). - May not work correctly if the input string is empty or null. **Library usage** The benchmark does not use any libraries, but it's worth noting that the `indexOf` method is a built-in JavaScript function that is part of the ECMAScript standard. It's implemented by most browsers and engines to provide efficient substring searching capabilities. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond regular JavaScript programming. The focus is on comparing two simple approaches to find the index of a substring, making it accessible to a wide range of developers. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to find the index of a substring within a string in JavaScript, some options include: * Using `str.includes()` (ECMAScript 2015+): This method returns a boolean indicating whether the string includes the specified value. * Using regular expressions: You can use regex patterns to match and extract substrings from strings.
Related benchmarks:
char index vs charAt() vs slice() for the last character
'of' vs indexed charAt() to iterate characters in a string
Find index in string with recursion vs findIndex
Trimming leading/trailing characters array
.includes() vs indexOf() for single-character search in string
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?