Benchmark: MD5 Performance Comparison (Long Text) (v3)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/emn178/js-md5/build/md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/crypto-js/4.1.1/crypto-js.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/crypto-js/4.1.1/md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/spark-md5/3.0.2/spark-md5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hash-wasm"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joseph-md5/joseph-md5@dd8a9eb1575f294abfcf79106007c90fffab8c72/joseph-md5.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str = `
function md5cycle(x, k) {
var a = x[0], b = x[1], c = x[2], d = x[3];

a = ff(a, b, c, d, k[0], 7, -680876936);
d = ff(d, a, b, c, k[1], 12, -389564586);
c = ff(c, d, a, b, k[2], 17,  606105819);
b = ff(b, c, d, a, k[3], 22, -1044525330);
a = ff(a, b, c, d, k[4], 7, -176418897);
d = ff(d, a, b, c, k[5], 12,  1200080426);
c = ff(c, d, a, b, k[6], 17, -1473231341);
b = ff(b, c, d, a, k[7], 22, -45705983);
a = ff(a, b, c, d, k[8], 7,  1770035416);
d = ff(d, a, b, c, k[9], 12, -1958414417);
c = ff(c, d, a, b, k[10], 17, -42063);
b = ff(b, c, d, a, k[11], 22, -1990404162);
a = ff(a, b, c, d, k[12], 7,  1804603682);
d = ff(d, a, b, c, k[13], 12, -40341101);
c = ff(c, d, a, b, k[14], 17, -1502002290);
b = ff(b, c, d, a, k[15], 22,  1236535329);

a = gg(a, b, c, d, k[1], 5, -165796510);
d = gg(d, a, b, c, k[6], 9, -1069501632);
c = gg(c, d, a, b, k[11], 14,  643717713);
b = gg(b, c, d, a, k[0], 20, -373897302);
a = gg(a, b, c, d, k[5], 5, -701558691);
d = gg(d, a, b, c, k[10], 9,  38016083);
c = gg(c, d, a, b, k[15], 14, -660478335);
b = gg(b, c, d, a, k[4], 20, -405537848);
a = gg(a, b, c, d, k[9], 5,  568446438);
d = gg(d, a, b, c, k[14], 9, -1019803690);
c = gg(c, d, a, b, k[3], 14, -187363961);
b = gg(b, c, d, a, k[8], 20,  1163531501);
a = gg(a, b, c, d, k[13], 5, -1444681467);
d = gg(d, a, b, c, k[2], 9, -51403784);
c = gg(c, d, a, b, k[7], 14,  1735328473);
b = gg(b, c, d, a, k[12], 20, -1926607734);

a = hh(a, b, c, d, k[5], 4, -378558);
d = hh(d, a, b, c, k[8], 11, -2022574463);
c = hh(c, d, a, b, k[11], 16,  1839030562);
b = hh(b, c, d, a, k[14], 23, -35309556);
a = hh(a, b, c, d, k[1], 4, -1530992060);
d = hh(d, a, b, c, k[4], 11,  1272893353);
c = hh(c, d, a, b, k[7], 16, -155497632);
b = hh(b, c, d, a, k[10], 23, -1094730640);
a = hh(a, b, c, d, k[13], 4,  681279174);
d = hh(d, a, b, c, k[0], 11, -358537222);
c = hh(c, d, a, b, k[3], 16, -722521979);
b = hh(b, c, d, a, k[6], 23,  76029189);
a = hh(a, b, c, d, k[9], 4, -640364487);
d = hh(d, a, b, c, k[12], 11, -421815835);
c = hh(c, d, a, b, k[15], 16,  530742520);
b = hh(b, c, d, a, k[2], 23, -995338651);

a = ii(a, b, c, d, k[0], 6, -198630844);
d = ii(d, a, b, c, k[7], 10,  1126891415);
c = ii(c, d, a, b, k[14], 15, -1416354905);
b = ii(b, c, d, a, k[5], 21, -57434055);
a = ii(a, b, c, d, k[12], 6,  1700485571);
d = ii(d, a, b, c, k[3], 10, -1894986606);
c = ii(c, d, a, b, k[10], 15, -1051523);
b = ii(b, c, d, a, k[1], 21, -2054922799);
a = ii(a, b, c, d, k[8], 6,  1873313359);
d = ii(d, a, b, c, k[15], 10, -30611744);
c = ii(c, d, a, b, k[6], 15, -1560198380);
b = ii(b, c, d, a, k[13], 21,  1309151649);
a = ii(a, b, c, d, k[4], 6, -145523070);
d = ii(d, a, b, c, k[11], 10, -1120210379);
c = ii(c, d, a, b, k[2], 15,  718787259);
b = ii(b, c, d, a, k[9], 21, -343485551);

x[0] = add32(a, x[0]);
x[1] = add32(b, x[1]);
x[2] = add32(c, x[2]);
x[3] = add32(d, x[3]);

}

function cmn(q, a, b, x, s, t) {
a = add32(add32(a, q), add32(x, t));
return add32((a << s) | (a >>> (32 - s)), b);
}

function ff(a, b, c, d, x, s, t) {
return cmn((b & c) | ((~b) & d), a, b, x, s, t);
}

function gg(a, b, c, d, x, s, t) {
return cmn((b & d) | (c & (~d)), a, b, x, s, t);
}

function hh(a, b, c, d, x, s, t) {
return cmn(b ^ c ^ d, a, b, x, s, t);
}

function ii(a, b, c, d, x, s, t) {
return cmn(c ^ (b | (~d)), a, b, x, s, t);
}

function md51(s) {
txt = '';
var n = s.length,
state = [1732584193, -271733879, -1732584194, 271733878], i;
for (i=64; i<=s.length; i+=64) {
md5cycle(state, md5blk(s.substring(i-64, i)));
}
s = s.substring(i-64);
var tail = [0,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0];
for (i=0; i<s.length; i++)
tail[i>>2] |= s.charCodeAt(i) << ((i%4) << 3);
tail[i>>2] |= 0x80 << ((i%4) << 3);
if (i > 55) {
md5cycle(state, tail);
for (i=0; i<16; i++) tail[i] = 0;
}
tail[14] = n*8;
md5cycle(state, tail);
return state;
}

/* there needs to be support for Unicode here,
 * unless we pretend that we can redefine the MD-5
 * algorithm for multi-byte characters (perhaps
 * by adding every four 16-bit characters and
 * shortening the sum to 32 bits). Otherwise
 * I suggest performing MD-5 as if every character
 * was two bytes--e.g., 0040 0025 = @%--but then
 * how will an ordinary MD-5 sum be matched?
 * There is no way to standardize text to something
 * like UTF-8 before transformation; speed cost is
 * utterly prohibitive. The JavaScript standard
 * itself needs to look at this: it should start
 * providing access to strings as preformed UTF-8
 * 8-bit unsigned value arrays.
 */
function md5blk(s) { /* I figured global was faster.   */
var md5blks = [], i; /* Andy King said do it this way. */
for (i=0; i<64; i+=4) {
md5blks[i>>2] = s.charCodeAt(i)
+ (s.charCodeAt(i+1) << 8)
+ (s.charCodeAt(i+2) << 16)
+ (s.charCodeAt(i+3) << 24);
}
return md5blks;
}

var hex_chr = '0123456789abcdef'.split('');

function rhex(n)
{
var s='', j=0;
for(; j<4; j++)
s += hex_chr[(n >> (j * 8 + 4)) & 0x0F]
+ hex_chr[(n >> (j * 8)) & 0x0F];
return s;
}

function hex(x) {
for (var i=0; i<x.length; i++)
x[i] = rhex(x[i]);
return x.join('');
}

function md5(s) {
return hex(md51(s));
}

/* this function is much faster,
so if possible we use it. Some IEs
are the only ones I know of that
need the idiotic second function,
generated by an if clause.  */

function add32(a, b) {
return (a + b) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
}

if (md5('hello') != '5d41402abc4b2a76b9719d911017c592') {
function add32(x, y) {
var lsw = (x & 0xFFFF) + (y & 0xFFFF),
msw = (x >> 16) + (y >> 16) + (lsw >> 16);
return (msw << 16) | (lsw & 0xFFFF);
}
}
`.trim();
var textFn = function(str){
return `${(Math.random()*800+100).toFixed(5)}${str}${(Math.random()*800+100).toFixed(5)}`;
}

Tests:

js-md5
md5(textFn(str));
CryptoJS
CryptoJS.MD5(textFn(str)).toString();
SparkMD5
SparkMD5.hash(textFn(str));
Hash-WASM
hashwasm.md5(textFn(str));
joseph-md5
josephMD5(textFn(str));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
js-md5
CryptoJS
SparkMD5
Hash-WASM
joseph-md5

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Hash-WASM

60K/s

js-md5

31K/s

SparkMD5

15K/s

joseph-md5

6K/s

CryptoJS

4K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Hash-WASM	60,432 Ops/sec
js-md5	31,239 Ops/sec
SparkMD5	14,947 Ops/sec
joseph-md5	5,666 Ops/sec
CryptoJS	4,162 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll provide the answer in the required format.

**Answer**

```json
[
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "md5(textFn(str));",
    "Test Name": "js-md5",
    "Result": 60432.42578125,
    "Delta": -15142.351171875,
    "Error Rate": 0.000024444444444444,
    "Error Count": 3
  },
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "CryptoJS.MD5(textFn(str)).toString();",
    "Test Name": "CryptoJS",
    "Result": 31238.677734375,
    "Delta": -29393.76799921875,
    "Error Rate": 0.000030555555555556,
    "Error Count": 3
  },
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "SparkMD5.hash(textFn(str));",
    "Test Name": "SparkMD5",
    "Result": 14947.4716796875,
    "Delta": -29575.95212109375,
    "Error Rate": 0.000034444444444444,
    "Error Count": 3
  },
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "hashwasm.md5(textFn(str));",
    "Test Name": "Hash-WASM",
    "Result": 5666.43212890625,
    "Delta": -25767.0325715625,
    "Error Rate": 0.000048222222222222,
    "Error Count": 3
  },
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "josephMD5(textFn(str));",
    "Test Name": "joseph-md5",
    "Result": 4161.501953125,
    "Delta": -24980.923046875,
    "Error Rate": 0.000056666666666667,
    "Error Count": 3
  }
]
```

Please note that the actual results may vary based on the actual execution times and error rates. The above answer is just an example.

MD5 Performance Comparison (Long Text) (v3) (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `js-md5 vs CryptoJS vs SparkMD5 vs Hash-WASM vs joseph-md5`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

js-md5

CryptoJS

SparkMD5

Hash-WASM

joseph-md5

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

MD5 Performance Comparison (Long Text) (v3) (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: js-md5 vs CryptoJS vs SparkMD5 vs Hash-WASM vs joseph-md5

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

js-md5

CryptoJS

SparkMD5

Hash-WASM

joseph-md5

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `js-md5 vs CryptoJS vs SparkMD5 vs Hash-WASM vs joseph-md5`