Benchmark: includes2 - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var a = Array(10000).fill(undefined).map((_, i) => i);
var b = a.reduce((acc, el) => {
    acc[el] = true;
    return acc
}, {});
var c = new Set(a);
var d = new Map(a.map(el => [el, true]));

Tests:

array
return a.includes(200)
obj
return b['200']
set
return c.has(200)
map
return d.get(200)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array
obj
set
map

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

includes2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array vs obj vs set vs map

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

array

obj

set

map

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results