Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test concat vs spread+push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
concat vs spread+push
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var original = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]; var _new = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h'];
Tests:
concat
original = original.concat(_new);
spread+push
original.push(..._new);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat
spread+push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing two different approaches to concatenate (join) two arrays (`original` and `_new`) in JavaScript: 1. `concat`: Using the built-in `concat()` method to merge the two arrays. 2. `spread+push`: Using a combination of the spread operator (`...`) and the `push()` method to append elements from one array to another. **What options are compared?** In this benchmark, we have two test cases that compare the performance of these two approaches: * `concat`: Using `original.concat(_new);` to concatenate the arrays. * `spread+push`: Using `original.push(..._new);` to append elements from `_new` to `original`. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **concat()**: * Pros: A simple, straightforward method that is easy to understand. * Cons: May be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of creating a new array. 2. **spread+push**: * Pros: Can be faster than `concat()` for large arrays since it appends elements directly without creating a new array. * Cons: Requires knowledge of the spread operator and can be less intuitive. **Library, special JS feature, or syntax used?** None specifically mentioned in this benchmark. However, the spread operator (`...`) is used in one of the test cases, which was introduced in JavaScript (ECMAScript 2015) as a way to expand arrays or objects into their individual elements. **Other considerations and alternatives:** 1. **Array.prototype.push.apply()**: Another alternative approach that uses `push()` with `apply()` method to append elements from one array to another. 2. **Using `forEach()` or `map()`**: While not directly compared in this benchmark, using a loop (e.g., `forEach()` or `map()`) can also be an option for concatenating arrays. Overall, this benchmark provides insight into the performance differences between two common approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript, which can be useful for developers looking to optimize their code.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator with more numbers
Array concat vs spread operator vs push v2
concat vs spread three arrays
concat vs spread vs push three arrays to new one FIX
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?