Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
hasOwnPropery vs Loop vs if ... in vs Object.entries
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
hasOwnPropery vs Loop vs if ... in vs Object.entries
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var value = { age: 18, male: true, name: 'Mark', id: 1 }
Tests:
hasOwnPropery
value.hasOwnProperty('name');
Loop
for (const key in value) { if (key === 'name') break; }
if ... in
if ('name' in value) { }
Object.entries
Object.entries(value).find(x => x[0] === 'name')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
hasOwnPropery
Loop
if ... in
Object.entries
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 120 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
hasOwnPropery
9152810.0 Ops/sec
Loop
8803207.0 Ops/sec
if ... in
10628943.0 Ops/sec
Object.entries
2449282.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases, explaining what's being tested, the pros and cons of each approach, and any relevant libraries or special features used. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark defines four test cases: 1. `hasOwnPropery` 2. `Loop` 3. `if ... in` 4. `Object.entries` Each test case has a unique "Benchmark Definition" string that specifies the JavaScript code to be executed. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a JavaScript object `value` with properties: `age`, `male`, `name`, and `id`. This object serves as the input data for the benchmark tests. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that only JavaScript code execution is being measured. **Individual Test Cases** Let's analyze each test case: 1. **`hasOwnPropery`**: Tests whether the property `name` exists directly on the object `value` using the `hasOwnProperty()` method. ```javascript value.hasOwnProperty('name'); ``` Pros: Efficient, as it only checks if the property is present in the object. Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of the `hasOwnProperty()` method. 2. **`Loop`**: Tests a loop that iterates over the object's properties using the `for...in` loop. ```javascript for (const key in value) { if (key === 'name') break; } ``` Pros: Can be efficient for simple objects, as it avoids the overhead of built-in methods. Cons: May not work correctly with objects that have inherited properties or complex property names. 3. **`if ... in`**: Tests an `if` statement using the `in` operator to check if the object has a property called `name`. ```javascript if ('name' in value) { // ... } ``` Pros: Efficient, as it only checks if the property is present in the object. Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of the `in` operator, which performs a runtime check against the object's prototype chain. 4. **`Object.entries`**: Tests the use of the `Object.entries()` method to iterate over an object's key-value pairs. ```javascript Object.entries(value).find(x => x[0] === 'name'); ``` Pros: Efficient for objects with many properties, as it avoids the overhead of the `for...in` loop. Cons: May not work correctly if the object has inherited properties or complex property names. **Libraries and Special Features** None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, they do rely on built-in JavaScript features: * `hasOwnProperty()` method (Test 1) * `for...in` loop (Test 2) * `in` operator (Test 3) * `Object.entries()` method (Test 4) **Other Alternatives** If you want to test alternative approaches, here are a few ideas: * Test the use of `Object.keys()`, `Object.values()`, or other object iteration methods. * Compare the performance of using `hasOwnProperty()` versus checking if a property is present in the object directly (e.g., using bracket notation). * Test the performance of different loop constructs, such as using `forEach()` or `reduce()`. These alternatives can help you gain more insight into the performance characteristics of different JavaScript constructs and iteration methods.
Related benchmarks:
undefined vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 2
hasOwnProperty string vs number
in vs. hasOwnProperty
in vs hasOwn
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?