Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice vs new array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice all vs slice half
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Tests:
slice all
var brr = arr.slice()
slice half
var crr = arr.slice(4,6)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice all
slice half
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/119.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 119 on Ubuntu
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
slice all
36119844.0 Ops/sec
slice half
48492076.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for creating an array from the `arr` variable: using the `slice()` method versus creating a new array using the `new Array()` constructor. **Options Compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **Slice Method**: `var brr = arr.slice()` 2. **New Array Constructor**: `var crr = new Array(arr.length)` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Slice Method**: + Pros: Efficient, creates a shallow copy of the original array, easy to use. + Cons: Can be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of creating a new object. * **New Array Constructor**: + Pros: Allows for more control over array creation (e.g., specifying initial values), can be faster for very large arrays. + Cons: Requires explicit knowledge of the array length, can be less intuitive. **Library Used** None is explicitly mentioned. The `slice()` method is a built-in JavaScript function that creates a shallow copy of an array. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`) in the HTML preparation code, which is not relevant to the comparison being made. However, it's worth noting that the spread operator is available in modern JavaScript versions (ECMAScript 2018+). **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to add more alternatives, you could consider including: * Using `Array.prototype.slice.call()` or `Array.prototype.slice.apply()` * Creating an array using `Object.create()` and then setting its elements * Using a library like Lodash's `slice` function Here are some brief explanations for these additional alternatives: * **`Array.prototype.slice.call()` or `Array.prototype.slice.apply()`**: These methods apply the slice method to an existing array-like object. They provide more control over the resulting array but may not be as efficient. * **`Object.create()` and then setting its elements**: This approach creates a new object using `Object.create()`, then sets its properties using `arr.forEach((element, index) => crr[index] = element);`. While it can create an array-like object, it's more verbose and less efficient than the other options. * **Lodash's `slice` function**: This library provides a highly optimized slice function that is faster than the built-in method. However, it requires including an external library. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may not be relevant to the specific use case of creating an array from a given array variable, but they demonstrate additional ways to approach the problem.
Related benchmarks:
Array clone
`Array.slice(-1)[0]` vs `Array[Array.length]`
sliceeee
arr.slice() vs [...arr]
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?