Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
getElementById vs getElementsByClassName a
(version: 1)
a
Comparing performance of:
getElementById vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelector
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="a" class="b"></div>
Tests:
getElementById
document.getElementById('a'); a.innerHTML="abc";
getElementsByClassName
let b = document.getElementsByClassName('b')[0]; b.innerHTML="def";
querySelector
let c =document.querySelector(".b"); c.innerHTML="ghi";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getElementById
getElementsByClassName
querySelector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
getElementById
256072.3 Ops/sec
getElementsByClassName
322921.0 Ops/sec
querySelector
327859.8 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested?** The provided benchmark measures the performance of three different ways to retrieve and manipulate an HTML element: `getElementById`, `getElementsByClassName`, and `querySelector`. The test case specifically targets the retrieval and manipulation of an element with the class name "b". **Options compared** 1. **`document.getElementById('a')`**: This method retrieves the first element with the id "a". It's a simple and straightforward approach, but it might not be efficient if there are multiple elements with the same id. 2. **`let b = document.getElementsByClassName('b')[0];`**: This method retrieves all elements with the class name "b" and returns an array containing the first element. If no elements match, it returns an empty array. It's a bit more complex than `getElementById`, but it can be less efficient if there are many matching elements. 3. **`let c = document.querySelector('.b');`**: This method retrieves the first element that matches the CSS selector ".b". It's similar to `getElementsByClassName`, but it's generally faster and more flexible, as it allows for more complex selectors. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **`document.getElementById('a')`**: * Pros: Simple, fast, and efficient when there's only one matching element. * Cons: May be slow if there are multiple elements with the same id. 2. **`let b = document.getElementsByClassName('b')[0];`**: * Pros: More flexible than `getElementById`, as it can match multiple elements with the same class name. * Cons: Can be slower than `querySelector` when matching many elements, and it returns an array even if only one element matches. 3. **`let c = document.querySelector('.b');`**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, especially for complex selectors. Returns a single value (the first matched element) instead of an array. * Cons: May not be as flexible as `getElementsByClassName`, as it requires a more specific CSS selector. **Library and its purpose** None mentioned in the provided benchmark data. **Special JS feature or syntax** The test case uses JavaScript methods to retrieve and manipulate HTML elements, which is the standard way of interacting with DOM (Document Object Model) in JavaScript. No special features or syntax are used here. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to include other approaches, some alternatives could be: 1. **`document.querySelector('[class="b"]')`**: This method uses a different CSS selector that targets elements with the class name "b". 2. **`element.matches('.b')`**: This method checks if an element matches the CSS selector ".b" using the `matches()` method. 3. **`Array.prototype.find()`:** This method finds the first matching element in an array of elements that match a certain condition. Note that these alternatives might not be included in the original benchmark, and their performance would depend on the specific use case and environment.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector() vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName[0] Perf
querySelector vs getElementById & getElementsByClassName
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName [0] with extra
Testing getElementById vs getElementsByClassName
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?