Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Merge two arrays - Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ] other = other.concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ] var other2 = [ ...other, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:120.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/120.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 120 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Array.prototype.concat
21375238.0 Ops/sec
spread operator
10682113.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The goal of this particular benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches for merging arrays: `Array.prototype.concat` vs the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Script Preparation Code** The provided "Script Preparation Code" section is empty, which means that MeasureThat.net will automatically generate a script for the test case. The script will contain the benchmark definition and any necessary setup. **Html Preparation Code** Similarly, the "Html Preparation Code" section is also empty, indicating that MeasureThat.net will create an HTML page with the necessary elements for the test to run. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Array.prototype.concat** ```javascript var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = other.concat(params); ``` This test case uses the `concat` method to merge an array `params` with another array `other`. The purpose of this test is to evaluate the performance of the `concat` method. 2. **Spread Operator** ```javascript var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ]; other = [...other, ...params]; ``` This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to merge an array `params` with another array `other`. The purpose of this test is to evaluate the performance of the new ES6 spread operator. **Library and Purpose** There are no specific libraries used in these benchmark cases. However, MeasureThat.net likely relies on JavaScript's built-in functionality for these tests. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The use of the spread operator (`...`) is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). The `concat` method has been part of JavaScript since its inception. The spread operator provides a concise way to merge arrays and objects, but it may have slightly different performance characteristics compared to traditional methods. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: * **Array.prototype.concat** + Pros: - Wide browser support (all versions of JavaScript) - Familiarity among developers + Cons: - May be slower than the spread operator in modern browsers - Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used correctly (e.g., modifying the original array) * **Spread Operator** + Pros: - More concise and readable code - Often faster than `concat` in modern browsers + Cons: - Less familiar among older developers - May not work as expected in some edge cases (e.g., merging objects) **Other Alternatives** Other alternatives for merging arrays include: * Using `Array.prototype.push.apply()` or `Array.prototype.splice()` * Using a library like Lodash's `merge` function Keep in mind that the performance differences between these methods may be negligible in most real-world scenarios. The choice of method often comes down to personal preference, code readability, and specific use cases. I hope this explanation helps software engineers understand the benchmark and its test cases!
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Concat vs Spread (Two Arrays)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (new try)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?