Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
parseInt vs Number vs ~~
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
No conversion vs parseInt vs Number vs ~~
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var intA = 42.034; var strB = "42.034";
Tests:
No conversion
var res = intA + strB;
parseInt
var res = parseInt(intA) + parseInt(strB);
Number
var res = Number(intA) + Number(strB);
~~
var res = ~~intA + ~~strB;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
No conversion
parseInt
Number
~~
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:120.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/120.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 120 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
No conversion
745.4M/s
parseInt
743.6M/s
~~
743.3M/s
Number
34.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
No conversion
745,357,568 Ops/sec
parseInt
743,623,808 Ops/sec
~~
743,337,600 Ops/sec
Number
34,903,272 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests the performance of three different ways to perform numerical conversions in JavaScript: 1. `parseInt` 2. `Number` 3. `~~` (the bitwise NOT operator, which can be used as a "trick" to convert a string to an integer) These three methods are compared for their execution speed. **Options Compared** The options being compared are the different ways to perform numerical conversions in JavaScript: 1. **parseInt**: Converts a string to an integer using the `parseInt` function. 2. **Number**: Converts a string to a number using the `Number` function. 3. **~~**: Uses the bitwise NOT operator (`~~`) to convert a string to an integer. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary of each approach: 1. **parseInt**: * Pros: Portable, widely supported, and relatively fast. * Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if the input string is not in the expected format (e.g., "42.034" would be converted to 42). 2. **Number**: * Pros: More modern and flexible than `parseInt`, can handle more complex inputs. * Cons: May be slower than `parseInt` due to its overhead, and may lead to unexpected behavior if the input string is not in a numeric format. 3. **~~**: * Pros: Fast and lightweight, with minimal overhead. * Cons: Non-standard and non-portable (not supported by all browsers), can lead to incorrect results if used incorrectly. **Library** None of these options rely on any external libraries. They are built-in JavaScript features or operators. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark, other than the `~~` operator which is a bit unconventional but widely supported. **Other Considerations** The benchmark does not account for the type of input data (e.g., floating-point numbers vs. integers) and may produce different results depending on the specific inputs used. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to perform numerical conversions in JavaScript, some options include: 1. Using a dedicated library like `lodash` or `moment.js`, which provide more robust and feature-rich functions for working with numbers. 2. Utilizing modern JavaScript features like template literals (`${}>)`) or computed property names (e.g., `{ foo: bar }[bar]`) to create dynamic numerical expressions. 3. Implementing custom conversion logic using regular expressions or other string manipulation techniques. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own trade-offs and performance implications, so it's essential to evaluate the specific use case and requirements before choosing an approach.
Related benchmarks
parseInt vs Number addition
parseInt vs Number parsing
parseInt vs Number vs implicit conversion
parseInt vs Number mult
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?