Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash 1 argument against 2
(version: 0)
lodash 1 argument against 2
Comparing performance of:
only 1 merge argument vs 2 merge arguments
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
only 1 merge argument
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = { d: 'test' }; var d = _.merge(a, b); d = _.merge(d, c);
2 merge arguments
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = { d: 'test' }; var c = _.merge(a, b, c);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
only 1 merge argument
2 merge arguments
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 119 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
only 1 merge argument
3546116.5 Ops/sec
2 merge arguments
5089282.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes two test cases: * The first test case, "only 1 merge argument", tests the behavior of Lodash's `merge` function with only one argument. It creates three objects: `a`, `b`, and `c`, and then merges them together using `_.merge(a, b)`. Finally, it merges the result with `c` again. * The second test case, "2 merge arguments", tests the behavior of Lodash's `merge` function with two arguments. It creates three objects: `a`, `b`, and `c`, and then merges them together using `_.merge(a, b)`. **Options compared** The two test cases compare the performance of Lodash's `merge` function under different conditions: * **Single merge argument**: Only one object is passed to the `merge` function. * **Two merge arguments**: Two objects are passed to the `merge` function. **Pros and Cons of each approach** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Single merge argument**: + Pros: May be faster since there's less work to do, as the function only needs to merge one object. + Cons: May not accurately reflect real-world usage, where `merge` is often used with multiple arguments. * **Two merge arguments**: + Pros: More realistic representation of real-world usage, where `merge` is often used with multiple arguments. + Cons: May be slower due to the additional work required to merge two objects. **Library and its purpose** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object merging, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's `merge` function is used to combine multiple objects into a single object. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special features or syntax in these test cases. They're straightforward JavaScript code that demonstrates the usage of Lodash's `merge` function. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to write similar benchmarks for other merge functions, you might consider using: * The built-in `Object.assign()` method: This is a simple and fast way to merge objects. * Other library implementations of `merge`: Such as `lodash.merge()`, `underscore.merge()`, or `js-merge`. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and usage patterns compared to Lodash's `merge` function. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
isFunction vs typeof function 6
isEmpty vs. vanilla
isUndefined
Lodash some vs isEmpty 2
lodash vs es6 test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?