Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.map vs preallocation ......
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
dynamic vs Preallocation
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
dynamic
const array = []; for (let i=0; i<10000000; i++) { array[i] = 1; }
Preallocation
const array = new Array(10000000); for (let i=0; i<10000000; i++) { array[i] = i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
dynamic
Preallocation
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by the `Script Preparation Code` field, which is currently empty. This means that the test script itself will be generated dynamically for each execution. However, we can look at the individual test cases to understand what's being compared: * The first test case, "dynamic", uses a loop to create an array of 10 million elements and assigns the value 1 to each element. * The second test case, "Preallocation", creates an array with 10 million pre-allocated elements using `new Array(10000000)`, then loops through it to assign values. **Options being compared** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: 1. **Dynamic allocation**: Creating the array dynamically using a loop, where each element is assigned individually. 2. **Preallocation**: Pre-allocating the entire array with the desired number of elements and then looping through it to assign values. **Pros and Cons** **Dynamic Allocation (Test Case: "dynamic")** Pros: * Flexibility: allows for dynamic changes in the size of the array * Memory efficiency: only allocates memory as needed Cons: * Potential performance overhead due to repeated allocations and assignments * May result in slower execution times compared to preallocation **Preallocation (Test Case: "Preallocation")** Pros: * Reduced overhead from repeated allocations and assignments * Faster execution times due to batch processing of elements Cons: * Fixed memory allocation for the entire array, which can lead to memory waste if not fully utilized * Less flexibility in terms of dynamic changes **Other Considerations** Both approaches have their trade-offs. Dynamic allocation is more flexible but may incur performance overhead, while preallocation provides faster execution times but can result in wasted memory. **Library/Feature Description (None)** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features being used in these benchmark tests. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives to consider: * **Using `Array.prototype.map()`**: This method can be used instead of dynamic allocation for creating arrays. It's often faster and more concise, but may not provide the same level of control as preallocation. * **Using `Buffer` or `TypedArray`**: For large datasets, using `Buffer` or `TypedArray` objects can provide better performance and memory efficiency compared to traditional JavaScript arrays. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would require modifications to the benchmark script to accommodate them.
Related benchmarks:
Map vs preallocation
Array.from() vs new Array() - map
Array.from() vs new Array().map()
Array.map vs preallocation ckck
Array Spread vs Fill vs New Array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?