Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for vs every
(version: 0)
Compare loop performance
Comparing performance of:
for vs every
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(100);
Tests:
for
function asd(arg) { return arg === 50; } function dsa() { for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { if (asd(i)) { return; } } } dsa()
every
function asd(arg) { return arg === 50; } function dsa() { return array.every((item, index) => asd(index)); } dsa()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
every
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: `for` loop and `every()` method in JavaScript. The purpose is to compare the execution speed of these two loops when iterating over an array of 100 elements. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **For Loop**: A traditional `for` loop that iterates over the array using a manual index variable. 2. **Every() Method**: An array method that returns `true` if all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **For Loop:** * Pros: * More control over loop iterations (e.g., breaking out early) * May be more efficient for small arrays or specific use cases * Cons: * Requires manual index management, which can lead to errors * Less concise and readable than other approaches * **Every() Method:** * Pros: * More concise and readable than traditional `for` loops * Eliminates the need for manual index management * Cons: * May be less efficient due to additional overhead from function calls **Library/Function** The `every()` method is a built-in JavaScript array method. It takes two arguments: a function and an array. The function is called on each element in the array, and if it returns `true` for all elements, the `every()` method returns `true`. If at least one element returns `false`, the method returns `false`. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark utilizes JavaScript's iterator protocol and the ability to use arrow functions with `every()`. The `every()` method is a part of the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard, which introduces several new features and improvements. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for iterating over arrays in JavaScript include: * **forEach() Method**: Similar to `every()`, but returns no value when all elements pass the test. * **map(), filter(), reduce() Methods**: These methods operate on arrays differently, such as mapping each element to a new value or filtering out elements that don't meet a condition. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be directly comparable to `for` loops and `every()` method in terms of performance or use cases.
Related benchmarks:
for vs foreach vs for..of (aprudnikov)
for vs foreach for (cached length) vs for..of
for vs every simple
for vs foreach123
for vs every simple32
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?