Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reassign vs create new
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
new variable vs reassign
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
new variable
var x = 10; var x2 = x*x; var y = 10; var y2 = y*y; var z = 10; var z2 = z*z; var h = 10; var h2 = h*h; console.log(x, x2);
reassign
var x = 10; var x2 = x*x; x = 11; x2 = x*x; x = 12; x2 = x*x; x = 13; x2 = x*x; console.log(x, x2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new variable
reassign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures two different approaches for performing calculations: reassigning a variable vs creating a new variable. In the first test case, "new variable", we see that a new variable `x2` is created by multiplying `x` with itself. The value of `x` remains unchanged throughout the calculation. In the second test case, "reassign", we see that the original variable `x` is reassigned a new value after calculating its square. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Reassigning a variable**: This approach reuses the same variable name (`x`) for multiple calculations. The result is that only one instance of the calculation is performed, and subsequent assignments overwrites the previous result. 2. **Creating a new variable**: This approach creates a new variable name for each calculation (e.g., `x2`). This results in a separate instance of the calculation being performed each time. **Pros and Cons** **Reassigning a variable:** Pros: * More concise code, as only one variable is used. * Potential performance benefits due to reduced memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. Cons: * Readability issues, as it can be unclear which variable name refers to what calculation. * Potential for bugs if the same variable name is reused across multiple calculations with different results. **Creating a new variable:** Pros: * Improved readability, as each variable name clearly indicates its scope. * Easier debugging and maintenance, as changes only affect specific calculations. Cons: * More verbose code, requiring more variable declarations. * Potential performance overhead due to increased memory allocation and garbage collection. **Other Considerations** In the benchmark results, we see that Firefox 59 performs slightly better on the "reassign" test case than on the "new variable" test case. This may be due to the caching behavior of the JavaScript engine or other optimization strategies specific to this browser version. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition, but the use of `console.log` suggests that the benchmark is running in a Node.js environment or another console-based application. **Special JS Feature** The use of ES6-style variable declarations (e.g., `var x2 = x*x;`) is not a special feature specific to any particular browser version. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Chrome) and SpiderMonkey (used by Firefox) have implemented these features with improved performance and caching. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for performing calculations in JavaScript include: * Using `const` or `let` declarations instead of `var`, which provides more memory safety guarantees. * Utilizing the `eval()` function, although it's generally discouraged due to potential security risks. * Employing a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler like V8 or SpiderMonkey, which can optimize performance-critical code paths.
Related benchmarks:
createElement vs cloneNode(false)
createElement vs cloneNode but form
createElement vs cloneNode v3
createElement vs deep cloneNode vs cloneNode
createTextNode vs cloneNode asdf not deep
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?