Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Getter Setter
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Plain property vs Get property vs Get plain property
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {test:1, get test2() {return 1} }; var proto = Object.getPrototypeOf(obj); Object.defineProperty(proto, "Test", { get() { return 1; }, });
Tests:
Plain property
var read = obj.test;
Get property
var gread = obj.Test;
Get plain property
var read2 = obj.test2;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Plain property
Get property
Get plain property
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined in two parts: Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code. The Script Preparation Code defines a JavaScript object `obj` with a property `test` and a getter function `get test2()` for another property `test2`. The getter function returns the value `1`. Then, it creates a prototype `proto` from the `obj` using `Object.getPrototypeOf()`, and sets a property `Test` on the prototype using `Object.defineProperty()`. This sets up the benchmark with two properties: `test` (which is not accessible via getter) and `Test` (which can be accessed via getter). **Individual Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **Plain Property**: The script defines a variable `read = obj.test;`, which attempts to access the non-existent property `test` directly. 2. **Get Property**: The script defines a variable `gread = obj.Test;`, which attempts to access the existing property `Test` via getter. 3. **Get Plain Property**: The script defines a variable `read2 = obj.test2;`, which attempts to access the non-existent property `test2` directly. **Library and Special JS Features** * In the Script Preparation Code, the `Object.getPrototypeOf()` function is used to create a prototype chain, which is a concept in JavaScript that allows you to inherit properties from parent objects. * The `Object.defineProperty()` function is used to define custom properties on an object, including getters and setters. This is not a built-in feature of JavaScript, but rather a standard library function provided by the ECMAScript specification. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares three different approaches: 1. **Plain Property**: Directly accessing a non-existent property (`obj.test`). 2. **Get Property**: Accessing an existing property via getter (`obj.Test`). 3. **Get Plain Property**: Directly accessing a non-existent property via getter (`obj.test2`). **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Plain Property**: * Pros: Simple, straightforward access. * Cons: May not work as expected if the property does not exist. 2. **Get Property**: * Pros: Works even if the property does not exist (returns undefined). * Cons: Requires the use of getter functions, which may be less intuitive. 3. **Get Plain Property**: * Pros: Similar to Get Property, but uses direct access instead of getter functions. * Cons: May not work as expected if the property does not exist. **Other Considerations** In addition to these options, it's worth noting that the benchmark also considers the following factors: * **Device Platform**: The benchmark is run on a Windows desktop device, which may have specific implications for JavaScript execution. * **Operating System**: The benchmark runs on Windows 10, which may affect JavaScript behavior. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches could be considered in this benchmark: * Using `in` operator to check if the property exists before accessing it. * Using a try-catch block to handle errors when accessing non-existent properties. * Using a different data structure or approach that avoids these issues altogether.
Related benchmarks:
Read property reflect vs getOwnPropertyDescriptor
Object.setPrototypeOf vs Object literal
const a = Object.getPrototypeOf({})
setPrototypeOf vs getPrototypeOf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?