Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Ternary operator vs String Interpolation
(version: 0)
Which one is better to convert Boolean value to string ternary operator or string interpolation.
Comparing performance of:
Turnary vs String interpolation
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var bool = true
Tests:
Turnary
bool ? "true" : "false"
String interpolation
`${bool}`
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Turnary
String interpolation
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for converting a Boolean value to a string: using a ternary operator (`bool ? "true" : "false"`), and using string interpolation (``${bool}``). **Approach Comparison** Two approaches are being compared: 1. **Ternary Operator**: This approach uses a single expression with three parts (condition, true branch, false branch) to convert the Boolean value to a string. 2. **String Interpolation**: This approach uses template literals with `${booleanValue}` syntax to convert the Boolean value to a string. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Ternary Operator:** + Pros: - Simple and concise syntax - No need for additional dependencies or libraries + Cons: - May require additional whitespace or line breaks to maintain readability - Can be slower due to the complexity of the expression * **String Interpolation:** + Pros: - More readable syntax, especially with larger templates - Can be faster due to the simplicity of the expression + Cons: - Requires additional dependencies or libraries (e.g., template literals) - May not work in older browsers that don't support template literals **Library/Feature Description** In this benchmark, both approaches rely on **template literals**, which is a JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Template literals allow for a more readable and flexible way of concatenating strings with expressions. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** This benchmark uses template literals (`${booleanValue}`), which is a special syntax in JavaScript. It's a relatively modern feature, so it may not work in older browsers or environments that don't support ES6+. **Other Alternatives** If you want to write a similar benchmark for other approaches, consider the following alternatives: * **Concatenation with `+`**: Instead of using ternary operators or template literals, you can use string concatenation with the `+` operator (`"true" + (bool ? "" : "false")`) * **Function calls**: You can also use function calls to convert Boolean values to strings (`Boolean(bool) ? "true" : "false"`) Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the original approaches, and you should consider factors like code readability, maintainability, and browser support when choosing an approach for your benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Boolean conversion - javascript
Math.max/min vs function ternary vs inline ternary
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operatorsd
Number.isInteger() vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?