Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JQuery Speed Test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
$jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js'></script> <script> var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"> </script> <script> var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <div> <ul id="menu"> <li class="menu-item"> </li> <li class="menu-item"> </li> <li class="menu-item"> </li> <li class="menu-item"> </li> </ul> </div>
Script Preparation code:
function tests($) { $('#menu').css({ 'backgroud': 'red' }); $('.menu-item').eq(2).hasClass('foo'); }
Tests:
$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
3 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:146.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/146.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 146 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
$jq1124
912521.6 Ops/sec
$jq224
403067.1 Ops/sec
$jq331
335442.4 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests the performance of three different versions of the jQuery library: * **$jq1124**: jQuery version 1.12.4 * **$jq224**: jQuery version 2.2.4 * **$jq331**: jQuery version 3.3.1 The benchmark measures how quickly each version can execute the following JavaScript code: * Sets the background color of an element with id "menu" to red. * Checks if a specific list item within the menu (the third one) has a class named "foo". **Options Compared:** The options compared are different jQuery versions, highlighting how performance can vary across releases. **Pros/Cons and Considerations:** * **jQuery 1.12.4 ($jq1124):** This is an older version. While it may be reliable and have good support for legacy projects, newer versions often offer performance improvements and bug fixes. * **jQuery 2.2.4 ($jq224):** A more recent release than 1.12.4, likely to have some performance enhancements over the older version. However, it might not be as optimized as the latest version. * **jQuery 3.3.1 ($jq331):** The most recent version tested, potentially offering the best performance due to ongoing optimization efforts by the jQuery team. **Library:** * **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, animation, and AJAX interactions. **Alternatives:** There are several alternatives to jQuery for accomplishing similar tasks: * **Vanilla JavaScript:** Using native JavaScript APIs directly can sometimes be faster than using a library like jQuery, especially for simple tasks. However, it often requires more code. * **Other Libraries/Frameworks:** * React, Angular, Vue.js are popular modern frameworks that handle DOM manipulation and event handling differently from jQuery. Let me know if you'd like to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
JQuery Speed Test
JQuery version speed test
Jquery v3.7.1 vs v4.0.0
JQUERY v3.7.1 vs v4.0.0 AND v3.7.1-slim vs v4.0.0-slim
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?