Benchmark: js search benchmark

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/lunr/lunr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://rawgit.com/bvaughn/js-search/1.2.0/dist/js-search.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/minisearch@2.2.2/dist/umd/index.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/fuse.js/dist/fuse.js"></script>
<script>

        Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {

          
  var books = [];
  var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
  xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {
    if (xmlhttp.readyState == 4 && xmlhttp.status == 200) {
      var json = JSON.parse(xmlhttp.responseText);
  
      books = json.books;
    }
  }
  xmlhttp.open('GET', 'http://bvaughn.github.io/js-search/books.json', true);
  xmlhttp.send();

        
  };


      
</script>

Tests:

Lunr
var idx = lunr(function () { this.ref('isbn'); this.field('title'); this.field('author'); books.forEach(function (doc) { this.add(doc) }, this); })
js search
var search = new JsSearch.Search('isbn'); search.searchIndex = new JsSearch.TfIdfSearchIndex('isbn'); search.addIndex('title'); search.addIndex('author'); search.addDocuments(books);
minisearch
var miniSearch = new MiniSearch({ fields: ['isbn', 'title', 'author'], // fields to index for full-text search }); miniSearch.addAll(books)
fuse.js
const options = { includeScore: true, keys: ['isbn', 'title', 'author'] } const fuse = new Fuse(books, options)

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 54 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 31 runs

js search

17.7M/s

Lunr

2.2M/s

minisearch

1.1M/s

fuse.js

701K/s

Fastest: js search (25.2x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ js search: 17,660,844 ops/sec
• Lunr: 2,208,190 ops/sec
• minisearch: 1,117,283 ops/sec
• fuse.js: 700,967 ops/sec

Firefox 18 runs

js search

8.3M/s

Lunr

1.7M/s

minisearch

914K/s

fuse.js

525K/s

Fastest: js search (15.8x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ js search: 8,311,532 ops/sec
• Lunr: 1,728,631 ops/sec
• minisearch: 914,306 ops/sec
• fuse.js: 524,990 ops/sec

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

js search

7.6M/s

Lunr

3.1M/s

minisearch

1.4M/s

fuse.js

976K/s

Fastest: js search (7.7x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ js search: 7,557,410 ops/sec
• Lunr: 3,059,727 ops/sec
• minisearch: 1,446,656 ops/sec
• fuse.js: 976,416 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Test case name	Result
Lunr
js search
minisearch
fuse.js

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:144.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/144.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 144 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

js search

10.5M/s

Lunr

3.2M/s

minisearch

1.5M/s

fuse.js

1.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ js search	10,507,306 Ops/sec
Lunr	3,173,895 Ops/sec
minisearch	1,525,388 Ops/sec
fuse.js	1,076,286 Ops/sec

js search benchmark (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `Lunr vs js search vs minisearch vs fuse.js`

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Lunr

js search

minisearch

fuse.js

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 54 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 31 runs

Firefox 18 runs

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

js search benchmark (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Lunr vs js search vs minisearch vs fuse.js

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Lunr

js search

minisearch

fuse.js

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 54 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 31 runs

Firefox 18 runs

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lunr vs js search vs minisearch vs fuse.js`