Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Regex vs string compare
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs String
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = "hello"; var regex = /^Hello$/i;
Tests:
Regex
regex.test(string);
String
"hello".toLowerCase() == string
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
String
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
12 days ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/147.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 147 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Regex
37076272.0 Ops/sec
String
53609708.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test to be performed. In this case, there are two benchmarks: 1. **Regex vs string compare**: This benchmark compares the performance of using regular expressions (regex) with comparing strings directly. 2. **String**: This benchmark tests the performance of converting a string to lowercase. **Options Compared** In the Regex vs string compare benchmark, we have two options compared: * **Regex**: The first option uses the `^` and `$` anchors in a regex pattern to match the entire string "hello" (case-insensitive). The `i` flag at the end of the pattern makes it case-insensitive. * **String**: The second option directly compares the converted lowercase version of the string `"hello"` with the original string. **Pros and Cons** Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages: * **Regex**: + Pros: Can be more flexible for complex matching tasks, allows for quantifiers (e.g., `.*`), character classes (e.g., `[abc]`). + Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of parsing the regex pattern. * **String**: + Pros: Generally faster and simpler, as it only involves a direct comparison. + Cons: Limited to simple string matching tasks. The choice between these approaches depends on the specific use case. If you need to perform complex text matching or validation, regex might be a better choice. However, if you're simply comparing strings directly, the plain `toLowerCase()` approach is likely faster and more straightforward. **Library Usage** There's no library mentioned in this benchmark definition, so we don't have any additional dependencies to consider. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses the following special JavaScript feature: * **Regex syntax**: The use of `^`, `$`, `.`, `i` flags, and character classes is specific to regex syntax. * **String comparison**: This is a basic string operation that's widely supported in most JavaScript engines. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test different approaches or libraries for this benchmark, some alternatives could be: * Using a different regex flavor (e.g., PCRE) or engine (e.g., URegex) * Comparing strings using other methods (e.g., using Unicode code points, bit manipulation) * Testing the performance of compiled regex engines (e.g., esprima, acorn) * Using a string comparison library like `lodash` or `string-patch` Keep in mind that the choice of alternative would depend on the specific requirements and goals of your benchmarking effort.
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.test vs RegEx.match when fails
Comparing performance of: String.search vs String.match
String.match vs. RegEx.test1
RegEx.test vs. Inline RegEx.test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?