Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Performance of getting the unicode characters of a string
(version: 0)
spread operator vs Array.from
Comparing performance of:
Spread operator vs Array.from
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var example = 'Iñtërnâtiônàlizætiøn☃💩';
Tests:
Spread operator
var result = [...example];
Array.from
var result = Array.from(example);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread operator
Array.from
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Purpose** The primary goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two different methods for extracting Unicode characters from a string: the spread operator (`...`) and `Array.from()`. **Comparison Options** There are only two comparison options: 1. **Spread Operator**: This method uses the syntax `[...example]` to create an array by spreading the contents of the `example` string. 2. **Array.from()**: This method uses the `Array.from()` function to create a new array from the elements of the `example` string. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: Easy to use, concise syntax, can be used with various data types (not just strings). + Cons: May not work as expected with non-string values or when dealing with Unicode characters. * **Array.from()**: + Pros: More versatile than the spread operator, can handle any type of input value, and provides better control over the extraction process. + Cons: Requires more code to use correctly, and its performance may vary depending on the browser and device. **Library and Special JS Features** In this benchmark, there's no specific library being used. However, it's worth noting that `Array.from()` is a built-in JavaScript function, so no additional libraries are required. As for special JavaScript features, none are mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to extract Unicode characters from a string, here are a few options: * Using `split()`: `example.split('')` * Using `map()`: `example.split('').map(() => '')` * Using `reduce()`: `example.split('').reduce((acc, char) => acc + char, '')` Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own pros and cons, and may not be as efficient or convenient as the spread operator or `Array.from()`. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The benchmark preparation code is quite simple: ```javascript var example = 'Iñtërnâtiônàlizætiøn☃💩'; ``` This code defines a string variable `example` containing some Unicode characters, which will be used to test the performance of the spread operator and `Array.from()` methods.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator perf
Array push vs spread operator
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Which is faster Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?