Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
textContent vs innerText v7
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
innertText vs textContent
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='one'></div>
Tests:
innertText
let theDiv = document.getElementById('one'); theDiv.innerText = "one"
textContent
let theDiv = document.getElementById('one'); theDiv.textContent = "one"
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
innertText
textContent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is comparing the performance of `textContent` and `innerText` properties in JavaScript when setting their values to a string literal. The goal is to determine which property is more efficient or faster. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **textContent**: This property is part of the DOM API and allows getting or setting the text content of an element. 2. **innerText**: This property is not part of the DOM API but is supported by some browsers, including Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer. It's primarily used for compatibility with older browsers. **Pros and Cons** 1. **textContent**: * Pros: Widely supported across modern browsers, part of the DOM API, and generally considered a good practice. * Cons: May not be as efficient or performant compared to other options. 2. **innerText**: * Pros: Can be useful for compatibility with older browsers, but it's not a standard property and may lead to inconsistencies. * Cons: Less supported across modern browsers, and its behavior might differ from `textContent` in some cases. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark. However, the DOM API (Document Object Model) is used implicitly through the use of `document.getElementById()` and accessing element properties like `innerText` or `textContent`. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark uses a simple JavaScript snippet to test both options. There are no special features or syntax used beyond standard JavaScript constructs. **Other Alternatives** If the goal was to compare the performance of other text content settings, alternatives could include: * Using HTML attributes (e.g., `aria-label`, `data-attribute`) instead of `textContent`. * Comparing the use of template literals (`\` template string \`) versus concatenation or string interpolation. * Testing different encoding schemes or character sets. Keep in mind that these alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark setup and execution. In summary, the current benchmark provides a clear comparison between `textContent` and `innerText`, highlighting the pros and cons of each approach. While there are no special features or libraries used beyond standard JavaScript, it's essential to consider alternative scenarios where different text content settings might be more relevant.
Related benchmarks:
innerText vs textContent + trim (HTML)
createTextNode vs textContent vs innerText vs innerHTML (for reading)
textContent vs. innerText vs. nodeValue
innerText vs innerHTML vs textContent
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?