Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
document.getElementById vs Date.now()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
getElementById vs Date.now()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<input type="text" id="spd_t" value="1">
Tests:
getElementById
var spd_tm = document.getElementById('spd_t').value;
Date.now()
var spd_tm = Date.now();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getElementById
Date.now()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: `document.getElementById` vs `Date.now()` for accessing the value of an HTML input element. **Options Compared** 1. **`document.getElementById`**: This approach uses the `Element` interface in JavaScript, which allows you to retrieve a DOM element by its ID. It returns the referenced element or null if not found. 2. **`Date.now()`**: This approach uses the built-in `Date` object's `now()` method, which returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC. **Pros and Cons** * **`document.getElementById`**: + Pros: It allows for more precise control over the DOM element being accessed. + Cons: It can be slower due to the overhead of navigating the DOM tree, especially for large documents. * **`Date.now()`**: + Pros: It is generally faster since it doesn't involve DOM manipulation and returns a simple numeric value. + Cons: It requires additional processing to convert the timestamp into a meaningful format. **Library Used (if applicable)** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** Neither of the test cases uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare these approaches, other alternatives could be: * Using `document.querySelector` instead of `document.getElementById` * Using a library like Lodash's `get` function for accessing DOM elements * Comparing with other methods for getting the current timestamp, such as `Performance.now()` or `performance.now()` However, in this specific benchmark, `Date.now()` is the clear winner due to its simplicity and speed. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The preparation code provided creates an HTML input element with a value of 1, which is used by both test cases: ```html <input type="text" id="spd_t" value="1"> ``` This ensures that both approaches are accessing the same input element's value.
Related benchmarks:
new Date().getTime() vs Date.now()
Date.now() vs new Date().toISOString()
Date.now() - Date.now() vs new Date() - new Date()
Date.now() vs. now()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?