Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array loop test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
for vs map
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
for
var arr = ["Saddam", "Sabbir", "Sakib"]; for(var i = 0; i<arr.length; i++) { console.log(arr[i]); }
map
var arr = ["Saddam", "Sabbir", "Sakib"]; arr.map(function(item, index) { console.log(item); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark results. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark tests the performance of two different approaches for iterating over an array in JavaScript: using a traditional `for` loop (`"for"` test case) and using the `map()` method (`"map"` test case). **Test Case 1: "for"** * **Code**: A simple `for` loop iterates over an array of strings, logging each string to the console. * **Library/Feature**: None. This is a standard JavaScript feature. * **Options Compared**: The performance of iterating over an array using a traditional `for` loop. **Test Case 2: "map"** * **Code**: An array of strings is passed to the `map()` method, which iterates over the array and logs each string to the console. The callback function takes two arguments: `item` (the current array element) and `index` (the current index). * **Library/Feature**: None. This is a standard JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. * **Options Compared**: The performance of iterating over an array using the `map()` method. **Benchmark Results** The benchmark results show that: * The `"for"` test case runs at approximately 15,260 iterations per second on Chrome 66. * The `"map"` test case runs at approximately 13,424 iterations per second on Chrome 66. **Pros/Cons of Different Approaches** * **For Loop**: Pros: + Easy to understand and implement for simple use cases. + Can be more efficient in certain scenarios (e.g., when dealing with sparse arrays). * Cons: + Less expressive than `map()` or other higher-order functions. + May require manual indexing, which can lead to errors. * **Map Method**: Pros: + More expressive and flexible than traditional `for` loops. + Automatically handles array indices for you. + Can be used with more complex callback functions (e.g., filtering, transforming). * Cons: + May incur a performance overhead due to the creation of a new array. **Other Alternatives** Some other alternatives for iterating over arrays in JavaScript include: * **ForEach Method**: Similar to `map()`, but returns `undefined` instead of creating a new array. * **Reduce Method**: Used to accumulate values from an array, often used with callback functions that take two arguments (the accumulator and the current element). * **Array.prototype.forEach()**: A more modern, iterative method for arrays. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own performance characteristics and use cases, depending on your specific requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Looping over an array
for loop vs Array.some
if-check in loop vs two loops
for of loop
testando 123 teste
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?