Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Hello 124
(version: 0)
Hello 124
Comparing performance of:
Parse vs Stringfy
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = '{"description":"Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.","myNumber":123456789,"myBoolean":true,"jayson":{"stringify":"JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....","parse":"JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string..."}}'; var obj2 = { description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.', myNumber: 123456789, myBoolean: true, jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' } }
Tests:
Parse
JSON.parse(obj)
Stringfy
JSON.stringify(obj2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Parse
Stringfy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark data and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition consists of two parts: 1. **Script Preparation Code**: This code snippet is used to create an object `obj` with nested properties: ```javascript var obj = '{\"description\":\"Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.\",\"myNumber\":123456789,\"myBoolean\":true,\"jayson\":{\"stringify\":\"JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....\",\"parse\":\"JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...\"}}'; ``` This code defines the structure of the object, including nested properties `jayson` with its own nested property `stringify`. 2. **Html Preparation Code**: This field is empty (`null`) in this benchmark definition. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases defined: 1. **"Parse"`: The benchmark definition is `JSON.parse(obj)`, which attempts to parse the string `obj` into a JSON object. 2. **"Stringfy"`: The benchmark definition is `JSON.stringify(obj2)`, which attempts to convert the object `obj2` (defined similarly as `obj`) into a JSON string. **Comparison of Options** The test cases compare two options: 1. **Parsing**: `JSON.parse(obj)` vs. No parsing (i.e., just using the original string `obj`) 2. **Stringification**: `JSON.stringify(obj2)` vs. No stringification (i.e., just using the original object `obj2`) **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each option: **Parsing (`JSON.parse(obj)`):** Pros: * Allows for more accurate handling of JSON data * Can detect errors in the input data Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of parsing * May not perform well on very large inputs **No Parsing (using `obj` directly)** Pros: * Faster execution, as no parsing is required * Suitable for small to medium-sized inputs Cons: * May lead to errors or unexpected behavior if the input data is malformed * Does not provide accurate representation of the original JSON data **Stringification (`JSON.stringify(obj2)`):** Pros: * Produces a more concise and human-readable representation of the object * Can be useful for debugging or logging purposes Cons: * May not preserve all details of the original object * Can be slower due to the overhead of stringification **No Stringification (using `obj2` directly)** Pros: * Faster execution, as no stringification is required * Suitable for small to medium-sized inputs Cons: * May lead to errors or unexpected behavior if the input data is malformed * Does not provide a concise representation of the object **Library: JSON** The benchmark uses the built-in `JSON` library in JavaScript. This library provides methods for working with JSON data, including `JSON.parse()` and `JSON.stringify()`. The `JSON` library is part of the ECMAScript standard and is supported by most modern browsers. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation. However, it's worth noting that the use of template literals (`obj = { ... }`) is a relatively recent feature in JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2015).
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone Array
lodash clonedeep vs json.parse(stringify()) 666
JSON.stringify vs structuredClone (with deeply nested objects)
test json vs omit
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?