Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Does the size of the object being assigned affect performance?
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
assigning 3 fields vs assigning 12 fields
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
assigning 3 fields
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { a: 1, b: '123', c: new Date() }
assigning 12 fields
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { a: 1, b: '123', c: new Date(), d: 1, e: '456', f: new Date(), g: 1, h: '789', i: [1,2,3], j: 1, k: '101112', l: new Date() }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
assigning 3 fields
assigning 12 fields
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference in assigning object properties. The test cases are designed to compare how the size of the object being assigned affects the execution time. **Options Compared:** 1. **Single Property Assignment**: In this approach, only one property is assigned to a new object. This represents a simple assignment operation. 2. **Multi-Property Assignment with 3 Fields**: In this test case, three properties are assigned to a new object. This scenario simulates a more complex assignment operation. 3. **Multi-Property Assignment with 12 Fields**: This is the most comprehensive test case, where all 10 properties (sampleData, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i) are assigned to a new object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Single Property Assignment**: * Pros: Simple assignment operation, minimal overhead. * Cons: May not accurately represent real-world scenarios where multiple properties are often assigned simultaneously. 2. **Multi-Property Assignment with 3 Fields**: * Pros: Simulates a more complex assignment operation, still relatively simple. * Cons: May introduce some overhead due to the creation of an object and property assignments. 3. **Multi-Property Assignment with 12 Fields**: * Pros: More comprehensive representation of real-world scenarios, potentially captures performance differences between single and multi-property assignments. * Cons: Introduces more complexity, which may lead to increased overhead and potential performance differences. **Library Usage:** The benchmark does not explicitly mention any libraries being used. However, the code snippets provided assume the use of modern JavaScript features, such as: * Template literals (`const secondObject = { ... }`) * Object literal syntax (`const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }`) These features are part of ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and later versions. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** The benchmark does not explicitly mention any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is typical for modern JavaScript code. However, it's worth noting that the use of template literals and object literal syntax might be considered advanced features by some standards. **Other Alternatives:** 1. **Single Property Assignment with a Different Data Type**: Instead of using string values, the benchmark could test assignment operations using different data types, such as numbers or booleans. 2. **Multi-Property Assignment with Variable Number of Fields**: The benchmark could test scenarios where the number of properties assigned varies dynamically, rather than being fixed at 3 or 12 fields. 3. **Assignment Operations in Different Contexts**: The benchmark could explore assignment operations in different contexts, such as within loops, conditional statements, or methods. 4. **Comparison with Other Assignment Methods**: The benchmark could compare performance differences between various assignment methods, such as using the `Object.assign()` method or creating objects using constructors (e.g., `new Object()`). By considering these alternatives, developers can further explore and validate their understanding of JavaScript's performance characteristics in different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
object assign vs object spread on growing objects
Dynamic property assignment vs Object.assign
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
JavaScript: Normal assignation VS Object.assign
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?