Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Destructuring assignment vs Set iterator - V2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Destructuring assignment vs Set iterator
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.mySet = new Set(); for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { window.mySet.add(`my_id_${i}`); }
Tests:
Destructuring assignment
const [myFirstSetElement] = mySet; console.log(myFirstSetElement);
Set iterator
const myFirstSetElement = mySet.values().next().value; console.log(myFirstSetElement);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Destructuring assignment
Set iterator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to retrieve an element from a Set data structure in JavaScript: 1. **Destructuring assignment**: Using the syntax `const [myFirstSetElement] = mySet;` to extract the first element of the set. 2. **Set iterator**: Using the `values()` method and the `next()` method to iterate over the set and retrieve the first element. **Options Compared** The two options are being compared in terms of their execution performance. The benchmark measures the number of executions per second for each option on a given browser configuration (Safari 16 on Mac OS X 10.15.7). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Destructuring assignment**: * Pros: Concise and readable syntax, can be faster since it doesn't require an explicit loop. * Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or Node.js versions, can throw errors if the set is empty. 2. **Set iterator**: * Pros: More flexible and robust than destructuring assignment, works with any JavaScript engine, and can handle large sets efficiently. * Cons: Requires more code and may be slower due to the overhead of creating an iterator and iterating over it. **Library/Functionality Used** None in this case, as both options rely on built-in JavaScript functionality. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses a feature called "destructuring assignment," which is a syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows assigning values from an iterable to multiple variables in a single statement. **Other Considerations** The benchmark assumes that the Set data structure is populated with a large number of elements (10,000) before running each test. This helps ensure that both options are executed under similar conditions and allows for fair comparisons. If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are some additional approaches to retrieve an element from a Set: * Using `Array.prototype.includes()` method: `mySet.has('my_id_0') ? console.log(myId) : console.log("Not found")` * Using `find()` method of the Array-like objects (not directly applicable to Sets): `mySet.values().find(x => x === 'my_id_0')` Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the original options.
Related benchmarks:
Memory Usage 2
set vs some
Set.prototype.has vs Object.hasOwn
Destructuring assignment vs Set iterator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?