Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice VS splice to remove first element
(version: 0)
100k list splice and shift win, they mutate list slice loose, it creates a copy of list 7.5x slower
Comparing performance of:
slice vs splice
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var list = []; for (var i = 0; i < 10000 * 1000; i++) { list.push(i); }
Tests:
slice
list.push('slice'); list = list.slice(1);
splice
list.push('splice'); list.splice(1, list.length-1);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
splice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is tested?** The provided benchmark tests two approaches to remove the first element from an array in JavaScript: using `splice` and using `slice`. The goal is to determine which approach is faster. **Options compared:** There are only two options being compared: 1. **splice**: Uses the `splice` method to remove the first element of the array. 2. **slice**: Uses the `slice` method to create a new array with the elements starting from the second position (index 1). **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **splice**: Pros: + Mutates the original array, which can be beneficial if you don't need a copy of the array. + Generally faster than `slice` because it only needs to update the length property of the array. * Cons: + Modifies the original array, which can lead to unexpected side effects if the array is used elsewhere in the code. + May not be suitable for use cases where a copy of the array is needed. * **slice**: Pros: + Creates a new array with the desired elements, ensuring the original array remains unchanged. + Can be useful when working with large arrays or when a specific subset of data needs to be extracted. * Cons: + Creates a new array, which can be slower than modifying the original array using `splice`. + Requires more memory to store the new array. **Library and syntax:** There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, both `splice` and `slice` are built-in methods in JavaScript. * **splice**: Returns a number of elements removed from the array. * **slice**: Creates a shallow copy of a portion of an array into a new array object. **Other considerations:** When working with large arrays or performance-critical code, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between modifying the original array and creating a new one. In general, `splice` is faster but modifies the original array, while `slice` creates a new array but may be slower. For most use cases, both approaches are acceptable, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your project. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives to remove the first element from an array include: * Using the `shift()` method, which also removes the first element from the array. * Creating a new array using the `Array.prototype.map()` method, which can be slower than `splice` or `slice`. It's worth noting that the best approach often depends on the specific JavaScript engine, browser, and version being used. MeasureThat.net provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of different approaches in various environments.
Related benchmarks:
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size (fork no string push)
slice VS splice VS shift: removing an elmeent from the middle
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size 100
slice VS splice : who get first 10 items faster
slice VS splice VS shift: smaller list, copy last half of array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?