Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.from() vs toString()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.from() vs toString()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
for (i = 100000; i < 20001; i++) {}
Tests:
Array.from()
Array.from(i)
toString()
i.toString()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.from()
toString()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The test is designed to compare two approaches: using `Array.from()` and `toString()`. The purpose of this comparison is likely to determine which method is more efficient for converting an array-like object (in this case, a simple integer `i`) into an array. **Options Compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **`Array.from(i)`**: This approach uses the `Array.from()` method, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It takes an iterable object (in this case, a number) and converts it into an array. 2. **`i.toString()`**: This approach simply converts the integer `i` to a string using the `toString()` method. **Pros and Cons** * **`Array.from(i)`**: * Pros: More modern and efficient way of creating arrays, as it uses a native method that is implemented in the browser's engine. * Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments. * **`i.toString()`**: * Pros: Wide support across different browsers and environments, including older ones. * Cons: Less efficient than `Array.from(i)`, as it involves additional string conversion steps. **Library and Special JavaScript Feature** There is no specific library used in this benchmark. However, the `Array.from()` method is a built-in JavaScript feature introduced in ES6. **Other Considerations** * The test starts by preparing an array-like object with 100,001 integers using the `for` loop (this is done to ensure that the tests are not affected by any optimizations related to integer ranges). * There's no user-defined function or custom JavaScript syntax involved in this benchmark. **Alternatives** If you were to recreate a similar benchmark, you could use other methods for creating arrays or converting numbers to strings. Some examples include: * Using `Array.create()` (an older method that is still supported in some browsers) * Utilizing `Uint8Array` and then converting it to an array using the `Array.from()` method * Converting integers directly to arrays by pushing them individually into a new array using array literal syntax (`[i, i, ...]`) * Using polyfills for older browsers that may not support `Array.from()` Keep in mind that each alternative will have its own trade-offs and potential limitations.
Related benchmarks:
Array constructor vs literal
Array constructor vs literal
set vs array iteration 100k elements
set vs array iteration 100kf
Performance of JavaScript .forEach vs for..of
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?