Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
pi 180
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
precalc vs live
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var pre = Math.PI / 180; var calculationOneX; var calculationOneY; var calculationTwoX; var calculationTwoY;
Tests:
precalc
calculationOneX = 100 + Math.cos(91 * pre) * 40; calculationOneY = 100 + Math.sin(91 * pre) * 40;
live
calculationTwoX = 100 + Math.cos(91 * (Math.PI / 180)) * 40; calculationTwoY = 100 + Math.sin(91 * (Math.PI / 180)) * 40;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
precalc
live
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests the performance of calculating trigonometric values in JavaScript. Let's break it down: **Options being compared:** * **`precalc` (Test Name: "precalc"):** This approach calculates `Math.PI / 180` once beforehand and stores it in the variable `pre`. Then, within the calculations for `calculationOneX` and `calculationOneY`, it uses this pre-calculated value. * **`live` (Test Name: "live"):** This approach calculates `Math.PI / 180` directly inside each calculation (`calculationOneX` and `calculationOneY`). **Pros and Cons:** * **`precalc` Pros:** Potentially faster because the division operation (`Math.PI / 180`) is only performed once. * **`precalc` Cons:** Takes up additional memory to store the pre-calculated value (`pre`). * **`live` Pros:** Doesn't require additional memory for storing a pre-calculated value. * **`live` Cons:** The division operation (`Math.PI / 180`) is performed repeatedly, which can be slightly slower. **Other Considerations:** The actual performance difference between these approaches is likely to be very small in most cases. Modern JavaScript engines are highly optimized, and the cost of a single `Math.PI / 180` calculation is negligible. **Alternatives:** * **Memoization:** A more advanced optimization technique than pre-calculation. It stores the results of expensive function calls and returns the cached result if the same inputs are used again. **Important Note:** JavaScript's `Math` object uses well-optimized built-in functions for trigonometric calculations. You should generally rely on these functions rather than attempting to implement your own trigonometry from scratch.
Related benchmarks:
pi 180
pi 180
Decimal rounding
Test sin computing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?