Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String replace using regex vs string qq
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
replace by regex vs replace via string
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = '-firsQWEtDeadlineRQWEeminderData__PS__assignment__PS__perEntityTQWE ype__PS__Applicant__PS__hasDeadline QWE' var regExp = new RegExp(/QWE|__PS__/gi);
Tests:
replace by regex
var res = string.replace(regExp, '.')
replace via string
var res = string.replace('__PS__', '').replace('QWE', '')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
replace by regex
replace via string
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two ways of replacing substrings within a given string: **1. Using Regular Expressions:** * **Benchmark Definition:** `var res = string.replace(regExp, '.')` * **Explanation:** This approach utilizes JavaScript's built-in `replace()` method in conjunction with a regular expression (`regExp`) to find and replace all occurrences of "QWE" or "__PS__" within the `string` variable with a dot (`.`). **2. Using String Replacements:** * **Benchmark Definition:** `var res = string.replace('__PS__', '').replace('QWE', '')` * **Explanation:** This method performs two consecutive `replace()` calls on the `string`. First, it replaces all instances of "__PS__" with an empty string. Then, it replaces all occurrences of "QWE" with an empty string. **Pros and Cons:** * **Regular Expressions (Regex):** * **Pro:** Can be more concise and powerful for complex replacement patterns involving multiple substrings or intricate matching logic. * **Con:** Can sometimes be less performant compared to direct string replacements, especially for simple cases. Regex parsing and matching can add overhead. * **String Replacements:** * **Pro:** Generally faster and simpler for straightforward replacements of known substrings. JavaScript's `replace()` method is highly optimized for this. * **Con:** Less flexible than regex for complex patterns; requires multiple calls if you need to replace several distinct substrings. **Other Considerations:** * **String Length:** The performance difference between the two approaches might be more noticeable with longer strings. * **Frequency of Replacements:** If replacements are performed frequently within your code, consider profiling both methods to determine the most efficient option for your specific use case. Let me know if you'd like to explore any aspect of this in more detail!
Related benchmarks:
replaceAll vs regex replace made in beethovben
String.prototype.replaceAll vs regular expression
String replace using regex vs string
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.replace vs String.replace classic
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?