Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
merge preformance compare
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs Object.assign vs spread
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = { lastPrice: '1234.345', contractVal: 109, marginAsset: 'GET', baseAsset: 'ASG', quoteAsset: 'ASFE', quantityPrecision: 8, pricePrecision: 4, equalQtyPrecision: 6, tickSize: 0.001, limitStepSize: 0.001, marketStepSize: 0.01, }; var p = { adl: 1234, askNotional: 2345236, bidNotional: 34636, collateral: 'AFE', marginAsset: 'EJG', cumRealized: 142565, entryPrice: 2356, id: '3452562', isolated: true, isolatedWallet: 1225, leverage: 23, markPrice: 34346, lastPrice: 567458, initialMarkPrice: 23456, notionalValue: 345346, positionSize: 45748, positionSide: 'ASGO', symbol: 'ASGT', unrealizedProfit: 1235, selectPrice: 12345, pushTime: 12435634578 } var b = { collateral: 'ASDG', askNotional: 1245, bidNotional: 3467, cumRealized: 5736, entryPrice: 23567, isolatedWallet: 23536, markPrice: 23678, notionalValue: 347345, positionSize: 3245247, unrealizedProfit: 3477, };
Tests:
lodash merge
var c = _.merge({}, a, p, b);
Object.assign
var c = Object.assign({}, a, p, b);
spread
var c = {...a, ...p, ...c};
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
Object.assign
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two scripts: `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`. The `Script Preparation Code` defines three test cases: 1. `merge`: Tests the performance of the `_` (Lodash) library's `merge()` function. 2. `Object.assign()`: Tests the performance of the built-in JavaScript `Object.assign()` method. 3. `spread`: Tests the performance of using the spread operator (`...`) to merge objects. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of three options: 1. **Lodash's `merge()` function**: This function takes multiple objects as arguments and returns a new object that contains all the properties from each input object. 2. **Built-in JavaScript `Object.assign()` method**: This method takes two or more objects as arguments and returns a new object that contains all the properties from each input object. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This operator allows you to merge multiple objects into a single object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary: 1. **Lodash's `merge()` function**: * Pros: Can handle nested objects, supports complex merging logic. * Cons: Adds additional dependencies (Lodash library) and may not be familiar to all developers. 2. **Built-in JavaScript `Object.assign()` method**: * Pros: Built-in, no additional dependencies required, widely supported. * Cons: Limited support for nested objects, requires multiple arguments. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: * Pros: Simple, intuitive syntax, works with modern browsers and Node.js. * Cons: Limited support in older browsers and Node.js versions. **Library Used** The benchmark uses the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a variety of functions for tasks like array manipulation, object merging, and more. The `merge()` function is used to test its performance. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None mentioned explicitly in the provided code snippets. However, it's worth noting that the use of Lodash suggests familiarity with modern JavaScript best practices and the importance of utility libraries for tasks like object merging. **Other Alternatives** If you need alternative implementations for the `merge()` function, you could consider using other libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality, such as: * **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library for JavaScript. * **Immutable.js**: A library for working with immutable data structures and functions. * **Built-in JavaScript `reduce()` method**: While not exactly the same as merging objects, you could use `reduce()` to achieve a similar result. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or trade-offs compared to Lodash's `merge()` function.
Related benchmarks:
Angular Copy vs Lodash Copy (large-ish data)
Compare objects
merge preformance compare 2
merge preformance compare 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?