Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Pre-created regexp vs created every time
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
pre-created vs created every time
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var preCreated = new RegExp('^dep:(first|second|third|fourth|fifth)$');
Tests:
pre-created
preCreated.test('dep:fifth');
created every time
(new RegExp('^dep:(first|second|third|fourth|fifth)$')).test('dep:fifth');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
pre-created
created every time
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmark in detail, highlighting what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features, and other considerations. **What is being tested:** The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring the performance difference between using a pre-created regular expression (RegExp) versus creating a new RegExp instance every time it's needed. The benchmark compares these two approaches in terms of execution speed. **Options compared:** 1. **Pre-created RegExp**: This approach creates a single, cached RegExp instance that is reused throughout the test. The RegExp pattern is defined during script preparation. 2. **Created every time**: This approach creates a new RegExp instance for each function call to `test()`. This instance is created dynamically every time it's needed. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Pre-created RegExp**: * Pros: + Reuses the same instance, reducing memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. + Can provide better performance due to reduced creation costs. * Cons: + Requires script preparation code to define the RegExp pattern before running the benchmark. 2. **Created every time**: * Pros: + Simplifies testing by eliminating the need for explicit script preparation code. + Reduces overhead related to caching and garbage collection. * Cons: + Creates a new instance every time, leading to increased memory allocation and garbage collection costs. **Library usage:** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. The RegExp class is built-in to JavaScript. **Special JavaScript features:** No special JavaScript features are mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. **Other considerations:** * **Cacheability**: The pre-created RegExp approach can benefit from caching, which can improve performance by avoiding unnecessary instance creation. * **Memory management**: Creating a new RegExp instance every time can lead to increased memory allocation and garbage collection costs. Reusing instances can help mitigate this issue. * **Test isolation**: Since both test cases use the same script preparation code, it's essential to ensure that any external dependencies or side effects are isolated to prevent affecting the benchmark results. **Alternative approaches:** 1. **Using a caching mechanism**: Implementing a caching mechanism within the JavaScript engine can help reduce the overhead associated with creating new RegExp instances. 2. **Using a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler**: Some JavaScript engines, like V8 in Chrome, have JIT compilers that can optimize and cache function calls, potentially improving performance for repeated function invocations. 3. **Measuring memory allocation costs**: Adding memory allocation cost metrics or using tools like `v8.getHeapStatistics()` (for V8-based engines) can provide more detailed insights into the performance differences between pre-created and created-on-the-fly RegExp instances. Keep in mind that the specific optimization strategies may vary depending on the JavaScript engine being used.
Related benchmarks:
Regexp creation vs memoization
new RegExp test 2
string startswith vs regexp test
RegExp constructor vs literal (re-do creation)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?