Benchmark: lodash clonedeep vs json.stringify()

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;

function recursiveDeepCopy(o) {
    var newO,
      i;
  
    if (typeof o !== 'object') {
      return o;
    }
    if (!o) {
      return o;
    }
  
    if ('[object Array]' === Object.prototype.toString.apply(o)) {
      newO = [];
      for (i = 0; i < o.length; i += 1) {
        newO[i] = recursiveDeepCopy(o[i]);
      }
      return newO;
    }
  
    newO = {};
    for (i in o) {
      if (o.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
        newO[i] = recursiveDeepCopy(o[i]);
      }
    }
    return newO;
  }

Tests:

Lodash CloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json Clone
myCopy = JSON.stringify(MyObject)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash CloneDeep
Json Clone

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.0 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Json Clone

10.9M/s

Lodash CloneDeep

5.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Json Clone	10,875,725 Ops/sec
Lodash CloneDeep	5,376,340 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two individual test cases for measuring the performance of cloning an object in JavaScript. The first test case, "Json Clone", tests the `JSON.stringify()` method to create a clone of the object `MyObject`. The second test case, "Lodash CloneDeep", uses the `_cloneDeep()` function from the Lodash library to create a deep copy of `MyObject`.

**What options are being compared?**

The two options being compared are:

1. **JSON.stringify()**: This method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string, which can be used to clone an object.
2. **Lodash _cloneDeep() function**: This function creates a deep copy of an object.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* `JSON.stringify()`:
	+ Pros: Simple to implement, widely supported.
	+ Cons: Not designed for creating deep copies; may not preserve all properties or data types; can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of converting to a string.
* Lodash `_cloneDeep()` function:
	+ Pros: Designed specifically for creating deep copies; preserves most properties and data types; generally faster than `JSON.stringify()`.
	+ Cons: Requires importing an additional library (Lodash); may have slightly higher memory usage.

**Library used in the test case**

The test case uses the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for JavaScript. The `_cloneDeep()` function is part of the Lodash collection and provides a simple way to create deep copies of objects.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

None are mentioned in this specific benchmark definition.

**Benchmark preparation code explanation**

The script preparation code defines an object `MyObject` with various properties, including a nested object `jayson`. The `recursiveDeepCopy()` function is defined to recursively clone the object. The Html Preparation Code includes a link to the Lodash library, which is required for the `_cloneDeep()` function.

**Other alternatives**

Some alternative methods for creating deep copies of objects in JavaScript include:

* Using the spread operator (`{...o}`) or `Object.assign()`
* Implementing a custom recursive cloning function
* Using a library like Immutable.js

However, these methods may not provide the same level of performance or property preservation as the Lodash `_cloneDeep()` function.

lodash clonedeep vs json.stringify() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Lodash CloneDeep vs Json Clone`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash CloneDeep

Json Clone

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

lodash clonedeep vs json.stringify() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash CloneDeep vs Json Clone

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash CloneDeep

Json Clone

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash CloneDeep vs Json Clone`