Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Fast deep equal vs strigify
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON vs fast equal
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/fast-equals@5.0.1/dist/min/index.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
// 1 level deep var data = [ { description: 'equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 1, equal: true, }, { description: 'not equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 2, equal: false, }, { description: 'number and array are not equal', value1: 1, value2: [], equal: false, }, { description: '0 and null are not equal', value1: 0, value2: null, equal: false, }, { description: 'equal strings', value1: 'a', value2: 'a', equal: true, }, { description: 'big object', value1: { prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop3: 'value3', prop4: { subProp1: 'sub value1', subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, }, prop5: 1000, prop6: new Date(2016, 2, 10), }, value2: { prop5: 1000, prop3: 'value3', prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop6: new Date('2016/03/10'), prop4: { subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, subProp1: 'sub value1', }, }, equal: true, }, ];
Tests:
JSON
data.forEach((item) => { JSON.stringify(item.value1) === JSON.stringify(item.value2); });
fast equal
data.forEach((item) => { window["fast-equals"].deepEqual(item.value1, item.value2); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON
fast equal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Definition and Test Cases** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for checking if two values are equal: using `JSON.stringify()` and using the `fast-equals` library. **Fast-Equals Library** The `fast-equals` library is a JavaScript implementation of the equality testing algorithm. It's used to check if two values are equal, ignoring various nuances like: * Null vs undefined * NaN (Not a Number) vs NaN * Symbol vs string or number * Array and object comparison The library provides several methods for checking equality, including `deepEqual` and `strictEqual`. In this benchmark, the `deepEqual` method is used. **JSON.stringify()** `JSON.stringify()` is a built-in JavaScript function that converts a value into a JSON string. When comparing two values using `JSON.stringify()`, it's essential to consider that: * Null vs undefined: `JSON.stringify(null)` returns `"null"`, while `JSON.stringify(undefined)` returns `""`. * NaN (Not a Number) vs NaN: `JSON.stringify(NaN)` returns `"NaN"`. * Symbol vs string or number: `JSON.stringify(symbol)` returns the symbol as a string. * Array and object comparison: `JSON.stringify(array)` returns an array of strings, while `JSON.stringify(object)` returns an object with key-value pairs. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **JSON**: Using `JSON.stringify()` to compare values. 2. **fast-equals**: Using the `deepEqual` method from the `fast-equals` library to compare values. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **JSON:** Pros: * Built-in JavaScript function, so no additional dependencies required. * Easy to understand and implement. Cons: * Can be slow for large objects or arrays, as it needs to serialize the entire value. * May not handle nuances like NaN, null vs undefined, or symbol comparisons correctly. **fast-equals:** Pros: * Optimized for performance, especially when dealing with large values. * Handles various nuances like NaN, null vs undefined, and symbol comparisons correctly. Cons: * Requires additional dependency (the `fast-equals` library). * May have a steeper learning curve due to its specific implementation. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is crucial, use `fast-equals`. Otherwise, `JSON.stringify()` might be sufficient. * Complexity: If you need to handle edge cases or nuances like NaN or symbol comparisons, `fast-equals` is a better choice. * Dependency management: Since `fast-equals` requires an additional dependency, consider this when deciding which approach to use. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for equality testing include: 1. **Lodash.equals()**: A more comprehensive implementation of the equality testing algorithm, providing various methods for handling edge cases. 2. **JSDiff**: A library specifically designed for comparing and formatting JavaScript code. 3. **Object.is()**: A built-in JavaScript function (available in ECMAScript 2015 and later) that checks if two values are equal or not. These alternatives offer different trade-offs between performance, complexity, and dependency management.
Related benchmarks:
Deep merge
Lodash.js vs Native kdsjbfkdsjnfdjsknfkjd
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal (2023)
or vs some 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?