Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String() vs .toString()rewfsdgdsg
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String() vs .toString() vs sds
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
String()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(String(num)); }
.toString()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num.toString()); }
sds
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num + ''); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String()
.toString()
sds
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of different JavaScript operations is crucial for understanding the underlying mechanisms and optimizing code for better performance. The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created on MeasurThat.net, which compares the execution times of three different approaches: 1. **String()**: This approach creates a new string object using the `String()` function. 2. **.toString()**: This approach calls the `toString()` method on an existing number value. **Pros and Cons:** * **String()**: * Pros: * Creates a new string object, which can be useful if you need to modify or manipulate the created string. * Can be safer in certain scenarios, as it avoids calling a method on a potentially mutable variable. * Cons: * Creates an additional object, which can lead to increased memory usage and overhead. * **.toString()**: * Pros: * Avoids creating an additional object and uses the existing number value's string representation directly. * Can be more efficient in terms of memory usage and computation. The choice between these approaches depends on your specific use case, requirements, and performance considerations. **Library Usage:** None of the test cases explicitly use any libraries, but some might depend on the JavaScript engine or environment used to run the tests. The benchmark results provided are likely specific to the Chrome browser running on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 system. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that requires any particular explanation.
Related benchmarks:
String() vs .toString() vs + string
instanceof String vs typeof string
json stringify vs String() vs int tostring
json stringify vs string tostring
Find index in string with recursion vs findIndex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?