Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
EventStore projection
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
isCategory First vs systemEventFirst
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
isCategory First
const event = { streamId: "$et-SomeEvent", type: "$>" } const isCategory = event.streamId.includes("-") const isSystemCategoryOrSystemEvent = event.streamId.startsWith("$") || event.eventType.startsWith("$") var result = (!isCategory || isSystemCategoryOrSystemEvent)
systemEventFirst
const event = { streamId: "$et-SomeEvent", type: "$>" } const isCategory = event.streamId.includes("-") const isSystemCategoryOrSystemEvent = event.streamId.startsWith("$") || event.eventType.startsWith("$") var result = (isSystemCategoryOrSystemEvent || !isCategory)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
isCategory First
systemEventFirst
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The test is measuring the performance of two different approaches for determining whether an event is a system category or a system event. The approach involves checking if the `streamId` includes a hyphen (`-`) and/or starts with a specific prefix (`$`). The purpose of this test is likely to measure the speed of executing these conditional checks. **Options compared:** The two approaches being tested are: 1. **isCategory First**: This approach first checks if the event's `streamId` includes a hyphen, and then checks if it starts with the system category or system event prefix. 2. **systemEventFirst**: This approach first checks if the event is a system category or system event by checking if the `streamId` starts with the system category or system event prefix. **Pros and Cons:** * **isCategory First**: + Pros: May be more intuitive for developers who are familiar with the system category concept. + Cons: If the hyphen is not present, it may lead to false positives (i.e., incorrectly identifying a non-system category as a system event). * **systemEventFirst**: + Pros: Avoids potential false positives by directly checking for the presence of the prefix. + Cons: May be less intuitive and more prone to errors if developers are not familiar with the system category concept. **Library usage** There is no explicit mention of a library being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of template literals (`const event = {...}`) and string interpolation (`$et-SomeEvent` and `$>` ) suggests that the benchmark may be targeting modern JavaScript engines that support these features. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is no explicit mention of a special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of double quotes (`"`) for string literals and template literals (`$` ) suggests that the benchmark may be targeting modern JavaScript engines that support these features. **Other alternatives** While there are only two options being compared in this benchmark, other approaches could include: 1. Using a regular expression to check for the presence of the hyphen or prefix. 2. Using a lookup table or dictionary to map stream IDs to their corresponding system category or event types. 3. Using a more complex conditional logic that takes into account additional factors (e.g., event type, timestamp). It's worth noting that these alternatives may not be relevant to this specific benchmark, and the focus is on comparing the performance of two simple approaches. Overall, this benchmark provides a good example of how to measure the performance of different conditional logic approaches in JavaScript. By understanding the options being compared, developers can gain insights into the trade-offs between approach simplicity, performance, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
test localstorage
Nested vs Cascade
JSON.parse - aggregated events vs single events
mcshlom: fastest way to recursively iterate a huge object
object.keys vs entries + filtering
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?