Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs filters
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
basic spread vs basic filter vs filter with conditional
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function getSampleItems(numItems) { const items = []; for (let i = 1; i <= numItems; i++) { items.push({ value: i.toString(), label: i.toString() }); if(i % 10 === 0){ items.push({ value: "divider-test-extra-characters"}); } } return items; }; var items = getSampleItems(1000);
Tests:
basic spread
const items2 = {...items};
basic filter
const items2 = items.filter((i) => true);
filter with conditional
const items2 = items.filter((i) => i.value !== "divider-test-extra-characters");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
basic spread
basic filter
filter with conditional
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares three different approaches to creating a copy of an array in JavaScript: 1. Using the spread operator (`const items2 = {...items};`) 2. Using the `filter()` method with a callback function that always returns true (`const items2 = items.filter((i) => true);`) 3. Using the `filter()` method with a conditional statement (`const items2 = items.filter((i) => i.value !== "divider-test-extra-characters");`) **Options Compared** The three options are compared in terms of their performance, which is measured by the number of executions per second. * **Spread Operator**: This approach uses the spread operator to create a new array with all elements from the original `items` array. * **Basic Filter**: This approach uses the `filter()` method with a callback function that always returns true, effectively creating a new array with all elements from the original `items` array. * **Filter with Conditional**: This approach uses the `filter()` method with a conditional statement to exclude certain elements from the resulting array. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: Simple, readable, and efficient ( creates a new array with all elements). + Cons: May not be suitable for large arrays or complex data structures. * **Basic Filter**: + Pros: Efficient (creates a new array with all elements), easy to implement. + Cons: May not perform as well as the spread operator for very large arrays, and may have additional memory overhead due to creating a new array. * **Filter with Conditional**: + Pros: Can be useful when filtering out specific elements based on conditions. + Cons: May have performance issues if the condition is complex or if the array is very large. **Library/Functionality Used** The `filter()` method is used in all three options, which is a built-in JavaScript function that creates a new array with all elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function. The spread operator (`...`) is also a built-in JavaScript syntax. No external libraries are required for this benchmark. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The use of the spread operator (`...`) and the `filter()` method with conditional statements are examples of advanced JavaScript features/syntax that may not be familiar to all developers. However, these features are widely supported by modern browsers and can be used in a variety of scenarios. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to creating an array copy in JavaScript, here are a few options: * Using the `Array.prototype.slice()` method: This approach creates a shallow copy of the original array using the `slice()` method. * Using the `Array.prototype.map()` method: This approach creates a new array with all elements from the original array after applying a transformation function using the `map()` method. However, these alternatives may not be as efficient or concise as the spread operator and `filter()` methods used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator 12
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
arr.slice() vs spread operator
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?