Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test js
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jquery1 vs jquery2 vs jquery3 vs umbrella1 vs umbrella2 vs umbrella3
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/zepto/1.2.0/zepto.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.10.1/umbrella.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/blissfuljs/1.0.3/bliss.min.js"></script> <div id="foo">Hello World</div>
Tests:
jquery1
var text = jQuery("#foo").text();
jquery2
var text = jQuery("#foo").html();
jquery3
var text = jQuery("#foo");
umbrella1
var text = u("#foo");
umbrella2
var text = u("#foo").text();
umbrella3
var text = u("#foo").html();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery1
jquery2
jquery3
umbrella1
umbrella2
umbrella3
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript code can be a complex task, as it involves various factors such as browser support, caching, and optimization. Let's break down what is tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmarked libraries** The benchmark uses four JavaScript libraries: 1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX. 2. **Zepto**: Another lightweight JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, similar to jQuery but with a smaller footprint. 3. **Umbrella**: A high-performance JavaScript framework that aims to provide a balance between features and performance. 4. **BlissfulJS**: A modern JavaScript library for building scalable web applications. **Tested methods** The benchmark tests the execution time of different methods in each library: 1. `jQuery("#foo").text();`: Retrieves the text content of an element with the id "foo" using jQuery's `text()` method. 2. `jQuery("#foo").html();`: Retrieves the HTML content of an element with the id "foo" using jQuery's `html()` method. 3. `jQuery("#foo");`: Returns a jQuery object representing the element with the id "foo". 4. `u("#foo");`: Calls the `u` function from the Umbrella library, which is likely used for DOM manipulation and event handling. **Options compared** The benchmark compares the execution time of each method in different libraries: * `jQuery` vs. `Zepto` * `jQuery` vs. `Umbrella` * `Umbrella` vs. `BlissfulJS` **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. ** jQuery** * Pros: Widespread support, large community, and a rich set of features. * Cons: Can be slow and bloated due to its size and complexity. 2. **Zepto** * Pros: Lightweight, fast, and compatible with older browsers. * Cons: Smaller community compared to jQuery, and fewer features. 3. **Umbrella** * Pros: High-performance architecture, flexible and customizable. * Cons: Smaller community compared to other libraries, and may require more expertise to use effectively. 4. **BlissfulJS** * Pros: Modern design, high-performance capabilities, and a growing community. * Cons: Still a relatively new library, with fewer resources and documentation available. **Other considerations** 1. **Browser support**: The benchmark results are specific to the Firefox 59 browser on Windows 10. Other browsers may behave differently or have varying levels of support for these libraries. 2. **Cacheability**: The performance results may be influenced by caching mechanisms in the browser, which can affect the execution time of repeated tests. 3. **Optimization techniques**: Libraries and frameworks often employ various optimization techniques, such as tree shaking or code splitting, to reduce bundle sizes and improve performance. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to these libraries, consider: 1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions for data manipulation and other tasks. 2. **React**: A JavaScript library for building user interfaces and managing state changes. 3. **Vue.js**: Another popular JavaScript framework for building web applications. 4. **Preact**: A lightweight alternative to React, designed for performance-critical applications. In conclusion, the benchmark provides valuable insights into the relative performance of different libraries and methods in the context of a specific use case. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which libraries to use for their projects.
Related benchmarks:
Updated 4/2018: Vanilla vs jQuery vs Zepto vs Umbrella vs Bliss JS Library Speed Test
Vanilla vs jQuery vs Zepto vs Umbrella vs Bliss JS vs Dom7 Library Speed Test
Vanilla vs jQuery vs Zepto vs Umbrella vs Bliss JS Library Speed Test111
Vanilla vs jQuery vs Zepto vs Umbrella vs Bliss JS Library Speed Test1111
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?