Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Set->Array.from vs iterative pushing 10k
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.from vs Push
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.from
var fooSet = new Set(); for(var i=0;i<10000;i++) { fooSet.add(i); } var other = Array.from(fooSet);
Push
var fooSet = new Set(); var fooArr = []; for(var i=0;i<10000;i++) { fooSet.add(i); fooArr.push(i); } var other = fooArr;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.from
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested on the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for converting a Set data structure to an Array: 1. **Set -> Array.from**: This approach uses the built-in `Array.from()` method to create a new array from the set. 2. **Push (iterative)**: This approach iterates over the set using a traditional loop and pushes each element onto a separate array. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * `Array.from()`: A concise and efficient way to convert a Set to an Array, leveraging the built-in `Array.from()` method. * **Push (iterative)**: A more traditional approach that uses a loop to iterate over the set and push each element onto a separate array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Set -> Array.from** Pros: * Concise and readable code * Efficient, as it leverages built-in functionality * Fewer lines of code Cons: * May incur additional overhead due to the use of `Array.from()` * Limited control over the conversion process **Push (iterative)** Pros: * Allows for fine-grained control over the conversion process * Can be optimized for specific use cases or performance-critical scenarios * No additional overhead from built-in methods Cons: * More verbose code * Requires explicit loop handling and array manipulation **Library: Set** The `Set` data structure is a built-in JavaScript object that stores unique values. Its primary purpose is to provide a fast and efficient way to store and manipulate sets of values. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options: * **Using `Array.prototype.forEach()`**: Another concise approach that uses the built-in `forEach()` method to iterate over the set and push each element onto a separate array. * **Using `for...of` loop**: A modern alternative to traditional loops, which can provide more concise and expressive code. * **Using `Map` instead of `Set`**: If you need to store key-value pairs, consider using `Map` instead of `Set`, as it provides additional functionality for working with maps. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be directly comparable to the original benchmark, as they might introduce different performance characteristics or trade-offs.
Related benchmarks:
Array construct vs array push
spread vs push large
Large arrays spread vs push
push vs push.apply vs const push spread vs let push spread vs reassign spread
Array.from() vs new Array() vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?