Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Promise vs async vs callbacks
(version: 0)
Promise vs async vs callbacks
Comparing performance of:
Callback vs Promise vs Async
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Callback
((next) => {next()})(() => {});
Promise
new Promise((resolve) => { resolve(true)});
Async
(async() => { await true; })();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Callback
Promise
Async
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 147 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Callback
1784997504.0 Ops/sec
Promise
5038325.5 Ops/sec
Async
1307326.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares three different approaches for handling asynchronous operations in JavaScript: 1. **Callbacks**: A callback function is a function passed as an argument to another function, which is then executed when the outer function completes. 2. **Promises**: Promises are objects that represent the eventual completion (or failure) of an operation and its result. 3. **Async/await**: Async/await is a syntax feature introduced in modern JavaScript that allows for asynchronous programming with a synchronous API. **Options compared** The benchmark compares the performance of each approach: * Callback: The callback function is called immediately, without waiting for the outer function to complete. * Promise: A promise is created and resolved with the result. The `await` keyword is used to wait for the resolution. * Async/await: The async function is executed, and the `await` keyword is used to wait for the resolution of the promises. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of each approach: * **Callbacks**: Pros: + Lightweight, no additional memory allocation required. + Easy to implement in older JavaScript versions. Cons: + Can lead to callback hell (nested callbacks), making code harder to read and maintain. + Error handling can be cumbersome. * **Promises**: Pros: + Easier to handle errors and chain multiple operations. + More expressive than callbacks, with a clear "either/then" structure. Cons: + Can lead to memory leaks if not properly cleaned up. + Less intuitive for beginners. * **Async/await**: Pros: + Simplifies asynchronous programming with a synchronous API. + Easy to read and maintain code. Cons: + Requires modern JavaScript versions (ES6+). + Can be slower due to the overhead of creating and managing promises. **Library and special JS feature** There is no specific library being used in this benchmark, other than the built-in JavaScript features mentioned above. **Special JS feature** The `await` keyword is a special JavaScript feature introduced in modern JavaScript versions (ES6+). It allows for asynchronous programming with a synchronous API, making it easier to write and read code that handles asynchronous operations. **Other alternatives** If async/await is not supported by the browser, developers can use callbacks or promises as an alternative. However, if they want to take advantage of the concise syntax and expressive nature of async/await, they may need to opt for a different approach, such as using Web Workers for parallel execution. In summary, the benchmark compares three approaches for handling asynchronous operations in JavaScript: callbacks, promises, and async/await. Each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
promise vs callback
just promise vs just callback
callbacks vs promises vs async/awaits
Async vs Callback
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?