Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
2023 js qs
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelector 1 vs querySelector 2 vs querySelector 3 vs querySelector 4 vs querySelector 5
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="content"><ul><li><a class="first" id="first">Tralala1</a></li><li><a>Tralala2</a></li><li><a>Tralala3</a></li></ul></div>
Tests:
querySelector 1
document.querySelector(".content ul li a")
querySelector 2
document.querySelector(".content > ul > li > a")
querySelector 3
document.querySelector(".content a")
querySelector 4
document.querySelector("ul li a#first")
querySelector 5
document.querySelector("ul li a.first")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector 1
querySelector 2
querySelector 3
querySelector 4
querySelector 5
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is an HTML snippet that represents the test case. In this case, there are five test cases: 1. `document.querySelector(".content ul li a")`: Tests the retrieval of an anchor element (`<a>`) within a list item (`<li>`) inside a container with class `.content`. 2. `document.querySelector(".content > ul > li > a")`: Similar to the first one, but uses a more explicit descendant combinator (`>`) instead of the space character. 3. `document.querySelector(".content a")`: Tests retrieving an anchor element within the same container as the previous two test cases. 4. `document.querySelector("ul li a#first")`: Tests retrieving an anchor element with a specific ID (`#first`) within a list item. 5. `document.querySelector("ul li a.first")`: Similar to the fourth one, but uses attribute syntax for the class selector (`[class="first"]`). **Options compared** In this benchmark, two main approaches are being tested: 1. **Space character vs. descendant combinator**: The first and second test cases use the space character as a separator between selectors, while the third test case uses a more explicit descendant combinator (`>`) instead. 2. **ID-based vs. class-based selector**: The fourth and fifth test cases use different methods to select an element with a specific class or ID. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Space character vs. descendant combinator**: * Space character: Easier to read and write, more human-readable. * Descendant combinator (`>`): Faster and more efficient for the browser, as it allows the browser to skip unnecessary elements in the DOM tree. 2. **ID-based vs. class-based selector**: * ID-based selector (`#first`): Faster and more efficient for the browser, as IDs are unique within a document. * Class-based selector (`[class="first"]`): More flexible and easier to maintain, but may be slower due to the need to iterate over all elements with the specified class. **Other considerations** 1. **Library usage**: None of the test cases use any external libraries or frameworks. 2. **Special JavaScript features or syntax**: The benchmark does not explicitly mention any special JavaScript features or syntax (e.g., async/await, Promises). However, it is possible that some browsers may optimize certain selectors using these features. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure the performance of CSS selector operations could include: * Using different types of selectors, such as attribute selectors (`[attr="value"]`) or pseudo-classes (e.g., `:hover`). * Adding more complex structures to the DOM tree, such as nested elements or event handlers. * Incorporating JavaScript code into the test cases, such as iterating over a list of elements or using loops.
Related benchmarks:
Jquery fastest selector
Find vs select
Find vs select
Elemint vs... (Lookup)
contains2 vs closest2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?