Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test if else 4
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
if vs if else
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var isOk = false
Tests:
if
let bReturn = false if (isOk) { bReturn = true; } return bReturn;
if else
let bReturn = null if (isOk) { bReturn = true; }else{ bReturn = false; } return bReturn;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
if
if else
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, we have two test cases: 1. "if": This test case measures the execution time of a simple if statement with no else clause. 2. "if else": This test case measures the execution time of an if-else statement. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a snippet of JavaScript that is executed before running each test case. In this case, it's `var isOk = false;`, which sets a variable `isOk` to `false`. **Html Preparation Code** There is no html preparation code provided for this benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** We have two test cases: 1. "if": This test case measures the execution time of the following JavaScript code: ``` let bReturn = false if (isOk) { bReturn = true; } return bReturn; ``` 2. "if else": This test case measures the execution time of the following JavaScript code: ``` let bReturn = null if (isOk) { bReturn = true; } else { bReturn = false; } return bReturn; ``` **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's likely that the test cases are running in a browser environment, which may use various libraries and frameworks under the hood. **Special JS Features or Syntax** This benchmark does not seem to be using any special JavaScript features or syntax. **Comparison of Options** Let's compare the two options: 1. "if": This option only checks if `isOk` is true and assigns a value to `bReturn` accordingly. 2. "if else": This option checks if `isOk` is true, assigns `true` to `bReturn`, and if false, assigns `false` to `bReturn`. The pros of the "if" option are: * Simpler code * Fewer branches to execute The cons of the "if" option are: * May not be as efficient as a more direct assignment of values The pros of the "if else" option are: * More explicit control flow * Allows for different assignments based on conditions The cons of the "if else" option are: * More complex code * More branches to execute **Other Alternatives** If you were to add another test case, you could consider options like: * A switch statement: This would allow you to check multiple values against `isOk` and assign different values to `bReturn`. * An if-elif chain: This would allow you to check for more complex conditions and assignments. However, these alternatives might make the benchmark even more complex and harder to understand. **Benchmark Result** The latest benchmark result shows that: 1. The "if else" option executed 4.36 seconds per second (with a raw UString of `Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/98.0.4758.80 Safari/537.36`). 2. The "if" option executed approximately 4.81 seconds per second. These results suggest that the "if else" option is slightly faster than the "if" option. However, it's essential to note that this benchmark is highly dependent on the specific conditions and environment in which it was run.
Related benchmarks:
pathOr vs direct
Test if else 2
Test if else 2bis
Test if else 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?