Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.min vs reduce
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Math vs Reduce
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = Array(1000).fill('').map(() => Math.random(0, 1) *10)
Tests:
Math
Math.min(arr)
Reduce
arr.reduce((a, c) => a < c ? a : c)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math
Reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Description:** The test compares the performance of two JavaScript functions: 1. `Math.min(arr)` 2. `arr.reduce((a, c) => a < c ? a : c)` Both functions are designed to find the smallest (or minimum) value in an array. **Options Compared:** There are only two options being compared: * `Math.min`: + Pros: Simple and straightforward implementation, easy to understand. + Cons: May not be as efficient for large arrays, as it requires iterating over each element once, which can lead to a time complexity of O(n). * `reduce()`: + Pros: Can be more efficient for large arrays, as it allows the reduction function to accumulate values and terminate early when the minimum value is found. + Cons: May have additional overhead due to the creation of an accumulator object, which can impact performance in some cases. **Library Used:** In this benchmark, the `reduce()` method uses the native JavaScript Array.prototype.reduce() method, which is a built-in function that iterates over elements in an array and applies a reduction function to each element. The purpose of this library is to provide a way to perform aggregate operations on arrays, such as finding the minimum value. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. Both `Math.min` and `reduce()` methods are standard JavaScript functions. **Other Considerations:** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the size of your array. For small arrays, `Math.min` might be sufficient. However, for large arrays, using `reduce()` can provide a performance boost due to its ability to accumulate values and terminate early. Keep in mind that this benchmark is specific to JavaScript and only compares the performance of these two functions within the context of an array. **Alternative Approaches:** If you need to find the minimum value in an array but want to avoid using `Math.min` or `reduce()`, consider the following alternatives: * Using a simple loop: Iterate over each element in the array and compare it with the current smallest value. * Using a custom accumulator object: Create a separate object to store the smallest value encountered so far, iterating over the array only when necessary. However, these alternative approaches may have different performance characteristics compared to using `Math.min` or `reduce()`.
Related benchmarks:
Right shift VS Divide and round
flatMap + reduce vs reduce + reduce
Math.max vs Array.reduce
flat vs flatMap vs reduce
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?