Benchmark: object read vs write

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {};
var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];

Tests:

write without reading
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { obj[arr[i % 4]] = true; }
check first before writing
var key; for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { key = arr[i % 4]; if (!obj[key]) { obj[key] = true; } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
write without reading
check first before writing

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches:

1. **Writing to an object without checking if it already exists**: This approach involves iterating over an array, accessing an element in the array as a key in the object, and assigning a value (in this case, `true`) to that key.
2. **Checking if an object property exists before writing to it**: This approach involves iterating over the same array, but first checking if the corresponding key in the object already exists using the `!obj[key]` expression.

**Options Compared**

The two approaches are compared in terms of their performance, measured by the number of executions per second.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Writing to an object without checking**: This approach can be faster because it avoids the overhead of the property check.
	* Pros: potentially faster, simpler implementation.
	* Cons: may lead to unnecessary iterations if a key already exists in the object.
2. **Checking before writing**: This approach ensures that keys are only added to the object if they don't already exist.
	* Pros: avoids unnecessary iterations, can help maintain data consistency.
	* Cons: introduces additional overhead due to the property check.

**Library and Special JavaScript Features**

The benchmark uses none of the mentioned libraries. However, it does employ a special JavaScript feature:

1. **Array iteration**: The benchmark uses `for` loops with array indices (`i`) to iterate over the array. This is a standard JavaScript feature.

**Other Considerations**

* **Object caching**: If the object being modified has a small size or is stored in memory, caching its contents could optimize the benchmark.
* **Async programming**: If the benchmark were run asynchronously (e.g., using `setInterval`), it might be more challenging to accurately measure performance due to potential delays between iterations.

**Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches to this benchmark could include:

1. **Using a data structure library**: Libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js provide functions for working with objects and arrays, which could simplify the benchmark.
2. **Measuring object property insertion as a separate operation**: Instead of comparing two approaches, the benchmark could measure the performance of inserting individual properties into an object, allowing for more nuanced comparisons.

Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on the goals and requirements of the benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

object read vs write (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: write without reading vs check first before writing

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

write without reading

check first before writing

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):