Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Round to 2 decimal places speed comparisons
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Round floating number using lodash round function vs Round float number with Math.round vs Round floating number using toFixed()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var x = Math.random() * 100;
Tests:
Round floating number using lodash round function
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { _.round(x, 2); }
Round float number with Math.round
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { Math.round(x * 100) / 100 }
Round floating number using toFixed()
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { Number(x.toFixed(2)); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Round floating number using lodash round function
Round float number with Math.round
Round floating number using toFixed()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to measure the speed of rounding floating-point numbers in JavaScript. The script preparation code generates a random float value `x` between 0 and 100, which will be used as input for the rounding operations. **Options Compared** There are three options being compared: 1. **Lodash's round function**: A popular utility library that provides various mathematical functions. 2. **Math.round**: A built-in JavaScript function to round a number to the nearest integer. 3. **toFixed()**: A method of the Number object in JavaScript, used to convert a floating-point number to a string with a fixed number of decimal places. **Pros and Cons** * Lodash's round function: * Pros: Generally faster than Math.round due to its optimized implementation. * Cons: Requires an external library, which might be slower to load and execute compared to built-in functions. * Math.round: * Pros: Fast and lightweight, as it's a built-in function. However, it can lead to rounding errors if the decimal part is not an integer. * Cons: May perform better in some cases than Lodash's round function due to its optimized implementation, but this difference is usually negligible unless dealing with very large datasets. * toFixed(): * Pros: Can be more readable and maintainable when working with fixed decimal places. However, it might be slower compared to Math.round for simple rounding tasks. **Library (Lodash)** The Lodash library provides the round function used in the benchmark. Its purpose is to provide a set of reusable functions that make common programming tasks easier. In this case, the round function is optimized for performance and can handle various data types, including floats. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** None mentioned explicitly. Now let's consider alternative approaches: * **Using built-in rounding methods**: Many programming languages provide built-in rounding functions or methods. For example, in Python, you would use `round()` to round a float. * **Manual rounding using binary search**: This method is more complex but can be faster than using an optimized library function like Lodash's round function for very large datasets. However, it requires a good understanding of the algorithm and the specific requirements of your use case. * **Using a parallel processing approach**: If you have access to multiple CPU cores or threads, you could divide the data into smaller chunks and perform rounding in parallel using multi-threading techniques. In conclusion, the provided benchmark is designed to measure the speed of rounding floating-point numbers in JavaScript, comparing three common approaches: Lodash's round function, Math.round, and toFixed(). The choice of approach depends on the specific requirements of your use case, such as performance needs or readability preferences.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.round VS Math.round (divide by 0)
lodash.round VS Math.round with precision
lodash.round VS Math.round (2 decimal places)
parsefloattofixed vs round
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?